The Spoiled Children of Fractivism

fractivism - Jim Willis reportsJim Willis
Editor & Publisher, Marcellus Drilling News (MDN)

Fractivism has produced a number of spoiled children who seem to think they’re allowed to do anything without the normal consequences of their behavior. 

Some children are never taught the life lesson that actions have consequences–and that you have to take responsibility for your actions. Some of those children grow into adulthood never learning that lesson. If you belong to groups that engage in “peaceful” blockades of fracking facilities or drill sites or pipeline sites, while shouting and screaming like you’re possessed, you might end up on a “watch list” by law enforcement.

Why? Because some who act the very same way you’re acting tilt over into acts of lawlessness such as sabotage and breaking things. It’s only prudent to keep an eye on groups of people who might be prone to such actions. But, if you’re a spoiled child who grew up to be a spoiled adult, a spoiled child of fractivism, you take offense at being held to account for your actions because, well because your actions shouldn’t have consequences. Your actions never had consequences when you were growing up. Why should they now?

We’re speaking about those who don’t like the fact that law enforcement and, yes, the drilling industry, keeps an eye on people who may be prone to breaking the law.

fractivism - WendyLynneLee

Case in point is Wendy Lee (pictured above), an avowed Marxist and philosophy professor at Bloomsburg University in Pennsylvania. (Why, exactly, do parents pay good money to send their children to that university? Good question!) Wendy didn’t like being questioned by a state trooper about trespassing at a compressor station site:

Lee is a 55-year-old philosophy professor at Bloomsburg University and proud anti-fracking activist.

“My long history of political activism is on the left,” she says. “I am the author of books with titles like ‘On Marx’ if that gives you an idea.”

She often travels to gas industry sites and takes photos. Her website is filled with criticism of fracking, and she’s used to getting criticized for her views.

Still, she was surprised last February when a Pennsylvania State Trooper came to her house to ask her about a visit she’d made to a gas compressor station.

On that trip, she was joined by two other activists and took some photos of the compressor. It wasn’t long before security guards told them all to leave.

“When they tell us to leave, we left,” she recalls. “There was no altercation. There was nothing.”

As the trooper stood inside her door, he questioned her about the incident. After a while, he brought up eco-terrorism.

Lee was stunned when he asked her if she knew anything about pipe bombs.

“Part of me was like, ‘Oh this is scary. This is actually scary.’” she says. “And part of me is just laughing on the inside because it’s ludicrous.”

Lee was never charged or arrested for anything.*

The Pennsylvania Trooper who questioned Ms. Lee was Mike Hutson. It rang a bell and when we trolled through the back articles we had written, we found that Trooper Hutson has been at this for some time. He investigated a string of pipe bombs found (along with other acts of terrorism) at drilling sites in four PA counties from 2012-2013 (see Domestic Terrorism on the Rise in PA Marcellus?).

Let us be perfectly clear: We are not saying, and not even remotely implying, that Ms. Lee has or had anything to do with pipe bombs and domestic terrorism. We’re quite sure she has not. What we are saying is that she should not be surprised that she might be considered a suspect because of her actions, her behavior in going where she had no right to go–and because of the type of activism she engages in. She’s running with a certain crowd, some members of whom cross the line. Law enforcement would not be doing their jobs if they didn’t consider all possibilities. She was investigated, and nothing came of it. Case closed. Move along.

fractivism Anadarko-Lockdown

Radical Earth First blockade of road in 2012

The American Civil Liberties Union, perhaps the most un-American organization in existence, admits that sometimes anti-drillers cross the line. Witold Walczack is the legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania:

Walczack has represented fracking opponents as clients. He says a small percentage of activists resort to crime.

There have been reports of pipe bombs, charred debris, and gunshots fired at gas sites.

“But the vast majority of people who are involved today in the anti-fracking movement are law-abiding citizens.”*

Er, uh, OK. The “vast majority” of these “peaceful protesters,” these proponents of fractivism, are law-abiding; but not all of them! Where should Trooper Hutson look for those leaving pipe bombs at drilling sites–among landowner groups? Those who work for energy companies? Ah no. You look for them where they are; among the more rabid leftist elements in the anti-drilling movement – the spoiled children of fractivism.

For more great articles on the subject of natural gas development every single day, subscribe to Marcellus Drilling News using this convenient link.

Check out what else is new at NaturalGasNow today!


While you’re at it, follow us on FacebookTwitter and Linked-In!


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

14 thoughts on “The Spoiled Children of Fractivism

  1. Pingback: The Spoiled Children of Fractivism | ShaleNOW

  2. Good article, but I have to take exception with the characterization of the ACLU as “the most un-American organization in existence.” They take on some really horrible and anti-American clients, but the actions of the ACLU go a long ways toward protecting the rights of the rest of us. I hate many of their clients, and many of the ACLU attorneys come across as self-important slime, but without the ACLU the Federal Government’s power grab would have gone even farther even faster. I think of them much like I think about a toilet snake–it does a nasty job and I don’t really want to touch it, but I’m glad it is there.

    • so who fired guns ? Personally I would handle this the way it is received .Just one of the issues NG drilling has created between citizens of NE PA .We might have gain profit but lost the respect one neighbor had for another .Money really is the root of All evil i guess .

      • Bill, I hate to say but i have to agree with you, in part! HVHF has caused trouble between citizens of NEPA. But those problem are brought by the NY paid activist! Besides a gray hair, that i would not let babysit my kids, and a bald guy paid off by lawyers looking for a lawsuit. Why are there not 10’s of thousands of people in NEPA trying to get gas out of the area? Why do you need to bus people in from other states? Why is it the same dozen people at every “protest” from Albany to Baltimore? Not getting there by electric cars BTW……

        I guess i will never know what its like to feel my need for attention is more important then the good of my community and country! Maybe you can tell me about it sometimes?

        • I believe you are misinformed .I live in PA and know plenty of people ( from PA that don’t like what has happened to them since NG drilling started here .I have seen families ,good neighbors and more argue about the extraction. Dimock is only one of the many areas ( see it here too ) where neighbors turn on neighbors and accepted strangers ( due to profit ) first.Just plain greed and what makes it really ironic is it all happened in a highly Christen environment .Much more than just going to church makes a person good !

        • also I have NO need for attention just concern and protection for myself,family ,neighbors and community .I do have a Big need for regulations and testing and making drillers face up to issues they have caused and prevent a heavy industrial operation from polluting our air,water and creating continuous 24/7 nuisances where I live.NO one can deny this occurs .Unless they are dumb or blind !

  3. This article is so typical of fracking industry apologists. You really have some nerve writing about, “Some children are never taught the life lesson that actions have consequences–and that you have to take responsibility for your actions.” The fracking industry has used the Halliburton loophole to evade scrutiny/responsibility for its actions. Now that research groups are finally able to press for such testing against reputable baseline data, they’re finding that, in fact, contamination of fracking fluids in well water; faulty lagoon construction that seep chemicals into ground water sources; faulty cementing of wells; spewing of huge amounts of Methane adding to the worst of climate change gases; etc etc.

    Not to mention the issue of Fracking companies incorporating in Delaware and thereby avoiding a huge chunk of taxes that are supposed to be paid to PA (one estimate as high as half a billion dollars). Or what about the millions of gallons of water PER well that is removed from the natural water cycle never to return due to contamination and irrradiation.

    It’s only a matter of time before the EPA be called into the fray for actual oversight of the fracking process. Let’s face it, the fracking industry has run roughshod over the American public’s right to health safety and welfare. The EPA should be ashamed of itself as should the US Congress for having allowed such a breach of trust.

    Also illustrative is the point that fracking companies have been found to actually harm American citizens isn’t being scrutinized (harassed) by legal authorities as was the PEACEFULLY protesting professor.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *