President Trump’s Speech to the Marcellus Shale Coalition

Tom Shepstone
Shepstone Management Company, Inc.

….
…. 

President Trump spoke to the Marcellus Shale Coalition members yesterday and extolled “their labor and their sweat that fueled America’s rise.”

As a public service in our role as a natural gas news journal, we offer below President Donald J. Trump’s entire speech to the Marcellus Shale Coalition yesterday in Pittsburgh. The most important parts are highlighted if you merely wish to scan the speech.

Trump

Thank you very much. What a nice group. Ah, you’re much happier. I was here three years ago; you’re much happier now. And you’re much wealthier, and you’re providing a lot more energy than you used to, that’s for sure. Right? Thank you.

You know, Harold is a very successful man. And I was with the great football coach, Barry Switzer. I think he might be the only one — he won in the NFL and he won in college, right? The championship. But Barry is a great guy. Great coach. And he’s one of Harold’s best friends.

And Harold [Hamm – CEO, Continental resources] was coming into a meeting, and I was talking to Barry. And he said about Harold, “You know, sir, that guy can take a straw” — probably the plastic ones, before they changed. I don’t think it would have worked; the paper straws aren’t working too well. “Sir, he can take a straw and he can put it into the ground, and oil comes out.” And other companies, they spend billions looking for oil. They want to find that oil. They just spend billions, and they can’t get it.

But this guy puts a straw in the ground. And I said, “How cool is that?” Right?

But that’s my friend, Harold. He’s a great gentleman. I learned a lot about energy from him.

But it’s wonderful to be here, back in Pittsburgh. By the way, go Steelers. Go Steelers. Big Ben. I guess, Big Ben is recovering. I know Ben. He’s a great guy. He’s a tough cookie. And he’ll be back, right? He’ll be back. Big Ben.

And you have a great — and you have a great ice hockey team, too. You have a great ice hockey team. Sidney Crosby, the whole group — you know, they were at the White House not a long time ago. And they came in and they are a great group of people.

So you have a great sports place and a great sports town.

But I’m here with the incredible people who fuel our factories, light up our homes, power our industries, and fill our hearts with true American pride. That’s you. And, by the way, you guys — sit down. Thank you. Sit down, everyone. We’ll be here for a little while. I like energy people. Energy people have a lot of energy, unlike some people I deal with. They got a lot of energy, in more ways than one.

Nobody does it better than the hardworking men and women of Marcellus Shale country. Wouldn’t it be great if New York realized what they’re sitting on top of — before the competing states take a lot of it? You know, it gets down a little bit, right? It keeps going down. They’ll say, “Hey, we used to have a lot of energy before they took them from Pennsylvania and Ohio.” But New York should do it, and New York should allow pipelines to go through so the people of New England can cut their energy costs in half, so the people in New York could cut their energy costs in half.

New York doesn’t allow pipelines to go through. I don’t know, there has to be some kind of a federal something that we can do there. But they won’t allow pipelines to go through New York; this is for a long time. And they won’t do any fracking in New York. And they won’t take all of that wealth underneath and reduce their taxes. Wouldn’t that be nice? They don’t do it in New York. Somebody, someday, will explain why.

They do it in Pennsylvania. They do it in Ohio. They do it in states right around New York. They don’t do it in New York. They’re sitting on a goldmine of energy.

With unmatched skill, grit, and devotion, you are making America the greatest energy superpower in the history of the world. You’re number one, by far, now. Right?

And I want to thank the Marcellus Shale Coalition, the Ohio Oil and Gas Association. Oh, I love Ohio. I love that state. Ohio. Don’t forget, for a year, I had to listen to, “You cannot win unless you win Ohio.” I said, “No, no: ‘The great state of Ohio.’ Please, treat it well.” And we won Ohio by a lot. It’s a great state.

And another great state: West Virginia. Right? I think we won West Virginia by 42 points. That’s a lot. I would say that’s a lot. But they’re great people. And, West Virginia Oil and Natural Gas Association, I want to thank you for the invitation to be here today. Two great groups.

We’re honored to be joined by members of my Cabinet who are fighting every day to support the American energy revolution. By the way, if the other people ever get in, everything I said, forget about. You won’t have money to pay for a ticket to this place. You’ll all be out of business very quickly. In the meantime, you’re doing better than you’ve even done.

But I have Cabinet members here. Interior Secretary — largest landlord in the United States by a factor of about 200 — David Bernhardt. Where’s David? David? Thank you, David. Stand up. What a great job. He’s basically the landlord to about half of the United States.

A friend of mine — a great gentleman. He’s going to be leaving, and, I’ll tell you, there’s one that’s going to do well. But he’s been right from the beginning. We’re almost three years, now. Energy Secretary, Rick Perry. Rick.

Great guy. Great guy. Great competitor. I ran against Rick. He was nasty. He was tough. He was tough. But he — he was a gentleman. And when he decided that it was time to do something else, there was nobody that could have been nicer. He’s been a tremendous asset to the administration. And he was a great governor of Texas. And he’s been a great — great job with the energy. And that includes nuclear energy. Really fantastic job. Thank you, Rick.

Another man who is here, who’s been incredible — he is a man that, no matter what you do, it’s never going to be considered right, because one group will like it and one group won’t. But he’s really tough. He’s really smart. And, by the way, he loves the environment: EPA Administrator, Andrew Wheeler. Andrew, you’ve done a fantastic job.

And he’s, right now, working on small refineries, getting them everything they need to stay because it’s a highly competitive business. We want to keep them really prosperous and keep them in business, Andrew. So, I know you’re working on that. And he’s dealing with them I think this week and next week, and you’ll hopefully have something for the small refineries.

Anybody here from small refineries? Yeah, a couple. Not too many. Don’t forget the small refineries. We don’t have — (laughter) — now, you’re going to take care of those small refineries. They’re great people, right? And they’ve really been incredible for our country.

Several outstanding members of Congress — these are warriors; these are people that fight with me all the time on the witch hunts. I’ve had the Mueller witch hunt, the Russia witch hunt. I have witch hunts every week. I say, “What’s the witch hunt this week?” They can’t beat us at the ballot box. They cannot beat us at the ballot box. So they want to try and beat us the old-fashioned way, which is not very nice. They are a nasty group of people.

And, you know, it’s very interesting: If you look at what’s happened and what’s been doing, and all the things we’ve done, and we have to get USMCA done, and they don’t want to put it up for a vote. And the Do-Nothing Democrats, they will pass it, but it has to be put up Nancy Pelosi. So let’s see what happens. But I think they’re going to put it up, because everybody

No, everybody wants it, and I think ultimately they’re going to do the right thing. But it’s all ready to go. It’s approved by Mexico. It’s approved by Canada. It’s approved by everybody that has to be approved. We have to give it a vote. It’s been sitting for a long time. A lot of money wasted, a lot of jobs wasted. It’s going to have a tremendous impact.

But these are warriors that have been with me right from the beginning. A friend of mine, Mike Kelly. Congressman Mike Kelly. Mike, stand up. Great job, Mike.

A man with the greatest name in show business: Guy Reschenthaler. Now, if anybody can get elected to Congress with that name, you got to be one hell of a talent. When you can have that name and get elected, I’ll tell you what. But he’s a warrior. They’re all warriors.

This group is incredible. I won’t say it about every group. Some aren’t warriors. But this group is incredible. It’s called “Pennsylvania.” It’s in the genes. It’s in the blood. Right? It’s in the blood.

Another terrific guy who’s always there: Lloyd Smucker. Thank you, Lloyd. Great job.

GT Thompson. We have them all today, huh? GT. We have them all.

The great John Joyce. John, thank you. Great job. Thank you, John.

Dan Meuser. Thank you, Dan. Thank you, Dan. Thank you. That looks like Cary Grant, doesn’t he? Have you ever been told that, Dan? It’s not a bad compliment, I must say.

Today we have Tom Arnold. In those days, you had a little different. Those days, you had Errol Flynn, Cary Grant. A little different. But today we’re doing better in so many different ways.

And, of course, somebody that fights like you’ve never seen before: Fred Keller. Fred. Thank you, Fred. Great. Doing a great job.

Thank you all. I mean, these are fantastic people.

And David. Where’s David? Is here there? Where’s David? What happened to him? All right, we won’t mention his name. He’s in the back. Pretend that I didn’t say it.

When I last spoke at this conference in 2016, American energy was under relentless assault from the previous administration. You know that so well. More than a third of all of the coal mining jobs had vanished. A moratorium had been placed on new coal leases on federal land. Drilling and mining on federal lands was blocked and restricted at every turn. Desperately needed pipelines were obstructed and denied. Federal regulations and bureaucrats were working around the clock to shut down vital infrastructure projects, bankrupt producers, and keep America’s vast energies and treasures buried deep underground. They didn’t want to let you go get them. So good for the American people in so many ways.

I promised that, as President, I’d unleash American energy like never before, because our natural resources do not belong to government, they belong to the people of this country.

American energy belongs to hardworking men and women like you who get up every day and make this country run.

Today, I’m proud to declare that I’ve delivered on every single promise I made to this conference three years ago, and much, much more. Every one.

Wow. Look at the great people. Thank you very much. Four more years. Why don’t you drive them crazy? Go 16 more years; you’ll drive them totally crazy. Sixteen more years. Thank you. Thank you.

We’re now energy independent. Who would’ve thought that? That wasn’t going to happen for a long time. We’ve ended the war on American energy, and we’ve ended the economic assault on our wonderful energy workers. You were under assault for a long period of time, but no longer. No longer.

That’s why we have to keep it going. Because if you talk about assault, it was nothing compared to what would happen if one of these people got in office. What they would do to you would be unthinkable.

And what they’d do to this incredible profession that you’re in, but this segment of the economy that’s so big and so vast and so many jobs, would be just absolutely terrible. Hard to believe they’re even talking the way they’re talking. And, in many ways, I think it actually would be worse than they’re even saying it will be.

In the process, we set off an economic boom of truly historic proportions, bringing prosperity back to cities and to towns all across America. Not only energy. Energy was just the first step in so many other ways. But without energy, it all doesn’t happen.

In my first week in office, I approved permits for the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines. And that’s a big thing. That was a very, very unfair situation in the case of Dakota Access. They had built it, except for one small section. And they weren’t being given the permits. They’d spent billions of dollars building it.

One small section where it connects, they were not going to get the permits. And I gave them the permits and they got it built, and it’s been operating now and very successfully. And a lot of jobs and a lot of everything else. And a lot of clean environment because that’s what it is.

And with Keystone — same thing. They have everything they need. They need a couple of little extra ones in one or two states, one state in particular, and they’ll start. And it’s a combination of 48,000 jobs on top of everything else.

We cancelled the last administration’s so-called Clean Power Plan. Sounds nice, but it wasn’t nice. It was a disaster. Which would have cost Americans nearly $40 billion a year and caused electricity prices to soar to double digits, while cutting coal production by almost 250 million tons.

We repealed the Interior Department’s Stream Protection Rule, which was a disaster. It sounds so beautiful. It sounds so beautiful, and it was so bad. Which would have cost businesses $1.2 billion and was a backdoor attempt to destroy the American coal industry — which is now starting to thrive again, which we’re very happy about.

We revoked the ridiculous Waters of the United States rule. No longer will federal bureaucrats be allowed to micromanage every public pond and drainage ditch on private land. They’ve taken away your rights. They took away your — they took away your heart. When I did that, I had people in my office — I had miners and I had farmers and I had builders building homes. And many of them were tough, strong men and women. And almost all of them were crying. They said, “Sir, you’ve given our life back to us.”

I did it in Minnesota with the Iron Range. Minnesota — we gave them back the Iron Range. That was closed by President Obama. Someday they’ll explain why they closed it. The finest iron ore in the world, they say.

I withdrew the United States from the terrible, one-sided Paris Climate Accord. It was a total disaster for our country. And I thought when I did that, it would be very tough. And all I do is get applauded for that move, so much. It would’ve been so bad for our country. They were taking away our wealth. It was almost as though it was meant to hurt the competitiveness — really, competitiveness of the United States. So, we did away with that one.

The Paris Accord would’ve been a giant transfer of American wealth to foreign nations that are responsible for most of the world’s pollution. Our air right now and our water right now is as clean as it’s been in decades. Shutting down American producers — the Paris Accord would’ve been shutting down American producers with excessive regulatory restrictions like you would not believe, while allowing foreign producers to pollute with impunity. They were allowed to do what they were doing.

I’m proud that, today, the United States has among the very cleanest air and drinking water on Earth — anywhere on Earth. And we’re going to keep it that way, because everybody in this room — you’re in the energy business, but you want the same clean water and same clean air that I do, that my family does, your family. So I just want to thank you. It’s really incredible. But we’re at a very, very good point environmentally right now.

What we won’t do to punish the American people while enriching foreign polluters. Because I can say it: Right now — and I’m proud to say it: It’s called “America First.” Finally, it’s called “America First.” My job is to represent the people of Pittsburgh, not the people of Paris.

We’re opening federal lands and offshore areas for responsible oil and gas production. And I opened ANWR to oil and gas in Alaska. You know, the ANWR site is one of the biggest in the world and nobody could get it approved, including Ronald Reagan. They could not get it approved. I got it approved. And it’s one of the — one of the great potential sites anywhere in the world.

Nationwide, the Interior Department — thank you, David – has been drilling permits — and you’ve seen drilling permits increase by over 300 percent since I’ve been in office. And we are issuing permits three times faster than when I first took office. And that number is going up, and we’re doing it in a very environmental responsible way. David, thank you. Thank you.

Oil production on federal lands is at an all-time high, and revenue to the American taxpayer from energy development has nearly doubled since I took office. Think of that.

We are streamlining the EPA’s oil and gas methane rule.

Saving energy producers millions of dollars in compliance costs while maintaining sterling environmental standards like never before.

We’re also slashing the time it takes to get a permit for building critical energy infrastructure into just a tiny fraction of what it took before. America built the Empire State Building in just one year. Believe it or not, in nine months. Can you believe that? They don’t do that today. It should not take 10 years to get the permits to build a road or a pipeline. We brought that number way, way down. way down.

And, in Texas, we’re working very, very hard — very, very hard — to get those pipelines approved environmentally. And I know my people are doing it. And, Rick, you’re going to be giving it to some of the most talented people that are going to be taking your position.

But we’re working very hard to get those pipelines approved immediately in Texas, because it would make a 20 percent and maybe even 25 percent increase in oil. And, you know, as I said before, we’re now number one, not by a little bit, but by far. Way ahead of Saudi Arabia. Way ahead of Russia. But we can do even much better than that.

So we’re working on that. And we’re going to also work on getting a pipeline through New York. We have to do that. We can’t let them hold us up like this.

And as I said, the energy prices in New England, if they allowed that to happen, could be cut in half. Energy prices in New York and other areas — we have to have a pipeline go through. They won’t let it happen. But we’ll do our best. Right? Right, Andrew? Good luck. We’ll get it. We’ll get it. It never made sense, does it? Can you imagine? They hold it up, they stop it. They stop it. Never made sense. That’s one — never made sense. And they don’t drill. They don’t frack. They’re sitting on a fortune.

What they could do — they could pay off their debt. They could pay off a lot of things. They could have taxes cut in half, maybe better than that. So, someday, somebody in this room is going to sit down and explain me to what the hell are they doing in New York. What tremendous — what tremendous potential. But we’ll be talking to Governor Cuomo about it. We’ll be talking to some of the people about it because I know the people in this room want it to happen because the prices of energy will go plummeting down.

The Interior Department has already cut the time it takes to complete an environmental impact statement from more than five years to less than one year. And the average page length is down nearly 90 percent.

I know all about environmental impact statements. I’ve done many of them. And then I see the same consultants that I’m paying up in places like Albany and different capitals of the states, and they’re working to make the rules much tougher so that we have to hire them to get our permits. But we’re trying to cut it way, way back because I want you people to be able to move fast.

And you know what? If you have a bad project, if you a bad road, if you have a bad pipeline, if you have a bad well, I don’t want you to get the permit. But you don’t have to wait for almost an entire lifetime to be told “no.” We’ll tell you in a year or less. And if you can do it, we’ll tell you in a year or shortly more than a year.

But we’ve brought roads — I mean, roads are under consideration for — we have roads, 21 years, 22 years. They end up costing many, many times more. Instead of a straight line, there’s one particular road; it looks like this. If you’ve had a couple drinks, you’re in big trouble. It ended up costing many, many, many times the cost. It took 21 years to get approved.

And they circled the nesting of, you know, things you want to save, you want to help, but you also have to worry about ourselves. So they have a road, instead of a straight line. They have a road that looks like the Indy Speedway. It’s not a good situation, and we’re trying to do away with that. And we’re very close to getting it. But permits that took 17, 18, 19 years, we think we can get — we’re down to two years. And we think we can get it around one. And you may get rejected, folks, but it’s going to be fast.

I have a friend who has been waiting 22 years to get a permit for something. I said, “You know, he’s devoted half of his life to getting one permit.” And then, in many cases, you don’t get them. They vote “no,” by a vote of three to two. The guy spent 22 years. I told him, I said, “You got to find another profession.” But now, he doesn’t, because we’re moving those time limits up like nobody can believe.

At long last, we’re reclaiming our American heritage as a nation of builders. You were stopped from building. They really stopped you. They really stopped you from building. You know what I mean.

And with the help of our pro-energy agenda — and, by the way, you’ll never have another President like me, okay? You’ll never have — that’s for sure. You’ll never have another President that’s going to do this, though. Because I was a builder. It’s what I did the best. I built. I really built good. I built under budget. I built ahead of schedule. You don’t hear those words too much in government. But I built. And I understand what you go through. I understand how you’re ruined, how you’re destroyed. I also understand how bad it is for our country.

But all of you here today have achieved something that everyone said was impossible: You’ve helped make America the number one producer of oil and natural gas on planet Earth, by far. Number one, by far. Number one, by far. And think what that means for jobs.

Think what that — I just left Louisiana recently. And we opened a $10 billion LNG plant. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a longer building. It’s like a sky scraper laid on its side. It is the most incredible thing you’ve ever seen. More pipes in that building that — nobody realized how complex it is. But it took years and years, and it was a dead project. And I had it approved almost immediately. You know what we’re talking about, fellas. And it just opened.

And I went, and we cut a ribbon, and it’s a tremendous success. And now, I think they’re going to double the size of that. We’re going to double it. It’s already about the biggest in the world, but they’re going to double it. It’s doing phenomenally well. It sold out for 25 years. You know what that means. It’s like an office building, except more money. Can you imagine? I never understood that, when they said it’s sold out — they sold it out. Other countries have purchased the LNG. But now they’re going to double it up and they’re going to build another one. And we have — in Texas, we have so many things happening. It’s so exciting.

We have a tremendous potential in our country. People don’t realize it. They think we’re doing well. When these trade deals become ripe — when we get them finished with China, where we’re doing fantastically well, fantastically well. When we get them finished with Mexico and Canada — USMCA. When we get some of the other ones, we — as an example, we finished it with South Korea. What a difference that has made. That was a Hillary Clinton deal. She said, “This will produce 250,000 jobs.” And she was right, except the jobs were produced for South Korea, not for us, okay? She didn’t tell us she meant South Korea. She said, “This is good for two hundred…” What a horrible deal that was, our deal with South Korea.

We’ve essentially terminated it and redone it. Brand-new deal. You guys know. And it’s now a really great deal. But that was a disaster. “Two hundred and fifty thousand jobs it will produce,” I remember her saying. And then it turned out that it was for a different country. We don’t like those deals, do we?

For the first time in more than 60 years, we are an exporter of natural gas. And our net energy imports are the lowest level in more than 60 years.

So, you know, on the Straits — the famous Straits, where they make so much money, and we protect everybody. We don’t get paid, but we’re starting to get paid a lot. But, you know, other people need those Straits. We don’t need them much anymore. They were saying, “How come American ships are doing so well?” Because we don’t have too many of them going over there anymore. Isn’t that amazing? We don’t have too many of them — dangerous territory. We don’t have too many of them going over.

My administration has more than doubled approvals for LNG exports, and it’s going much, much higher than that in the pipeline. I look forward to seeing even more brand-new LNG facilities built with American labor and American steel.

You know, with the pipelines that we approved, I said, “I want them to use American steel.” Like on Keystone, I said, “I want them to use American steel.” And they came to me, they said, “Sir, we have a problem. They already bought it. They’ve got it. They just can’t get their permits.” Can you believe it? They had the pipeline.

And so it was a little bit tough to say, “Bury it.” And we went — so I gave them a little break. What am I going to do? But we’ll write right on the bottom. Somebody said, “Well, that’s a little bit complex.” I said, “No, it’s not. Give me a pen. ‘You must use American steel.’” And we’re doing that more and more and more. Right? Our guys are doing that.

To restore American manufacturing, we’re reversing decades of disastrous trade policies that devastated our working-class communities. Pennsylvania lost one in three — can you believe that? And it’s actually a higher a number; we want to be conservative. Because with the fake news, I have to be very conservative. Otherwise, they’ll say, “He didn’t tell the truth. He didn’t tell the truth.”

So we’re very conservative with these numbers. The fake news.

But Pennsylvania lost more than one in three manufacturing jobs after a twin disaster took place, and that’s NAFTA and China’s entrance into the World Trade Organization. That was a disaster. China was mainlining. And then, all of the sudden, it went up like a rocket ship because of a certain politician that came up with the idea for the WTO. That was not a good idea. It may have been worse than NAFTA, and I never thought anything could be worse than NAFTA.

We’re standing up for our great workers. And America is winning, winning, winning once again. And we’re winning. We’re winning. And we’re respected again. We’re respected. You know, respect is a part of winning. We’re respected again, as a country. We’re not laughed at. And it’s getting more and more that way. And you know it, and I know it. And, you know, most importantly, other countries know it. They know it.

After losing 60,000 factories — so, when I first saw that number a few years ago, I said, “That can’t be right.” I’ve got to be careful, because I have these people back here. And they’ll say, “It’s not 60. It’s like 5.” Right? It’s 60,000. So I had it researched and checked. And you know it’s right when they never correct you. I’ve been saying it for years. It’s true. It has to be right.

Otherwise, they’d say, “He’s not telling the truth.”

But after losing 60,000 — it’s not even possible to believe that much — 60,000 factories under the previous two administrations, we’ve now gained nearly 10,000 new factories under my administration, under the Trump administration.

And NAFTA, that we’ve been talking about, will be replaced with the USMCA, which will really be a historic win for American energy producers, farmers, and factory workers of all types. The Do- Nothing Democrats in Congress, including Democrat Conor Lamb.

This guy talks so nicely about me. He’s, like, got my policy, except for one problem: He never votes with me — never, ever, ever.

They want to take away your guns. Conor Lamb wants to take away your guns.

They want to take away your energy. That one you know, right?

So, Conor Lamb — right here from Pittsburgh. And I appreciate — Conor, whoever you are — I have no idea what you even look like. But there’s some guy named Conor Lamb who speaks very nicely about — you know why? Because you’re in like a Trump district. No, it’s right. It’s true. Right?

“No, the President is excellent. He’s doing a good job.” I thought he was a Republican until I found out. I thought — I said, “This guy’s got to be a Republican.” But he never votes with us. That’s the only thing that matters, right? We don’t get his vote.

But we have to stop this Democrat insanity and get back to work. We have to pass the USMCA.

And, by the way, I have to tell you something. There’s a guy named Sean Parnell, who is a fantastic military man. Brilliant. Got everything going. And I heard, fellas — maybe my genius congressman can tell me — I hear that Sean is going to — Sean Parnell is going to run against Conor Lamb. That will help the energy business a lot. And he should win. He should win. And Sean will vote for us, and he’ll work for us.

Industries are racing back to America because we’ve made this the best place in the world to hire, to invest, build, and to grow. We’ve enacted fair trade policies, unlocked affordable energy, cut a record number of job-killing regulations, and made our tax code globally competitive.

Our taxes were a disaster. You couldn’t compete with other nations. Since our tax cuts were passed — the largest tax cuts in the history of our country — the Democrats want to raise your taxes. I don’t know, how does that work, politically? I haven’t figured that one out. They want to raise your taxes. I talk about tax cuts. They say, “No, we want to raise your taxes.” You know, they’re vicious and they stick together. But they’re lousy politicians, I will tell you. It’s true.

They got two things. They’ve got two things: They stick together and they’re vicious. Their policies are horrible: open borders, sanctuary cities, take everyone’s guns away.

But they do — they stick together. They don’t have a Mitt Romney in their midst. They don’t have the Mitt Romneys of the world. They stick together better than the Republicans do.

I love the Republicans. Ninety-four and ninety-five percent approval rating they gave me recently. But still, they don’t — they don’t stick. We got to stick together. We got to stick together. Right?

Since our tax cuts were passed, nearly $1 trillion have returned from other countries back home, where it belongs. Think of it: We’ve gotten $1 trillion — trillion, with a “T” — $1 trillion back from overseas, from other countries that, instead of spending the money over there — the reason was it was prohibitive; you couldn’t do it. It was bureaucratically impossible and the tax rate was so high, nobody would do it. Now the money is pouring back into our country, and they’re using it for lots of different things. One trillion dollars. It’s going to be much more than that.

Massive new investments are bringing thousands of energy jobs to states like Ohio and West Virginia that we mentioned, that we love. New Mexico, which I think we’re going to win. You know why we’re going to win New Mexico? Because they want safety on their border. And they didn’t have it.

And we’re building a wall on the border of New Mexico. We’re building a beautiful wall, a big one that really works, that you can’t get over, you can’t get under. And we’re building a wall in Texas. And we’re not building a wall in Kansas, but they get the benefit of the walls that we just mentioned.

And Louisiana is incredible. We have a great race in Louisiana. The governor turned out to be not very popular. We have a race between a great Republican and a governor that has not done a good job — high taxes, horrible insurance. They can do so much better. We have a great Republican running in Louisiana. You’ve been watching that the last week.

Indiana, Michigan, Tennessee, Pennsylvania — so many states, such potential. Such potential for growth.

Two months ago, I traveled to Beaver County, not far from us today — (applause) — where Shell — anybody here from Shell? Shell? Where Shell is making the largest investment in Pennsylvania’s history. Think of that. That’s a big investment.

Their gigantic new petroleum plant and petrochemical plant — it’s the biggest — one of the biggest in the world — will create more than 600 new Pennsylvania jobs and thousands and thousands of construction jobs, and provide a tremendous boost to the local economy, to put it mildly. A similar $10 billion investment will soon, we believe — got to get a little more push — be coming to the great state of Ohio. They’ll like that. Great people in Ohio. Great.

And our goal is to bring 100,000 — that’s a lot of jobs — energy jobs to Appalachia, and to rebuild this magnificent region. And it is a magnificent region with magnificent people, which was forgotten for too long by the Democrats. And they’d get votes. The Democrats would get votes.

And remember what I said? “What do you have to lose?” I said it to Appalachia, and we did tremendously. I said it our great African American community. I say, “What do you have to lose?” You have the most crime. You have the worst education. You have the lowest home ownership. You have all of these horrible statistics, I’m reading. And then I said, “What do you have to lose?”

Now, the African American community has the lowest unemployment numbers in the history of our country. They have the best employment numbers in the history of our country. They have their best poverty numbers in the history of our country, in the positive sense. And I think we’re going to do great with the African American community and the Hispanic community — which has its best numbers that they’ve ever had. Their median income — Hispanic median income is the highest it’s ever been: over $50,000 per person.

And all of those people that came out and they came out to vote, they’ll never be forgotten again. The Democrats are trying to figure out: Where the hell did they all come from? It was something.

You know, a number just came out. I don’t know if you saw. Moody’s — respected. And it said that, under the Bush administration, for eight years, median household income went up $400. That’s over eight years. Okay? So, remember: $400, eight years. Under President Obama, median household income went up $975 over eight years.

Over your favorite President — President Donald J. Trump — (applause) — median household income, for two and a half years — so remember this: eight years, eight years, 400 bucks — 400 bucks. You don’t even — that gets wiped out by inflation. Four hundred dollars. Nine hundred and seventy-five dollars.

In two and a half years, our number is $5,000, plus $2,000 for the tax cuts. Seven thousand dollars. How do you lose that debate? How do you lose that one? When you’re up debating, how do you lose those debates?

But we’re very proud of those numbers. Very, very proud of what’s happened with unemployment for African American, for Asian and Hispanic. The numbers are the best in the history of our country.

With American energy once again powering our prosperity, the United States has the hottest economy recognized by everybody, anywhere on Earth. These leaders from other countries — prime ministers, presidents, kings, queens, and dictators — they just don’t want to be known as a dictator. Actually, some do, but they don’t want to be known as a dictator.

But they come in and they say, “President, we’d like to congratulate you on the economy.” They’re trying to copy us. I say, “It won’t work.” Because we have the greatest people on Earth. We really do. We have the greatest people on Earth. I really believe that.

Since the election, we’ve created more than 6.4 million new jobs, including more than 240,000 jobs in Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. A beautiful number is that more than 2 million Americans have been raised out of poverty, taken out of poverty. Wages are rising and they are rising the fastest of all — a lot of you people are going to like this — for the blue-collar workers. The best proportion of anybody. Blue-collar.

In the first half of this year, wages for the lowest income workers increased by more than 6 percent — an unheard of number. Unemployment is at the lowest rate in more than 51 years.

Joining us today are a few of the hardworking Americans who are thriving thanks to America’s booming energy sector. Andrea Brownlee owns and operates a trucking company that services the natural gas industry. Andrea — she’s seen growth in her company. She’s seen growth in the energy industry like she never thought was possible. Could you come up and say a few words please, Andrea? Thank you.

MS. BROWNLEE: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you.

I grew up here in the Ohio Valley. The daughter of a steelworker, still actively farming on my grandfather’s farm.

I own Brownlee Trucking, a small business providing logistic services to the ever-growing natural gas industry here in Western Pennsylvania, which has allowed us to provide more jobs and opportunities to provide quality health insurance and benefits for our employees. Because of the policies and support of natural gas, we have seen amazing growth in the industry and a future with good-paying jobs for our children here at home and Western Pennsylvania. Thank you.

Great job. They like you. Great job. Thank you, Andrea.

Rawley Cogan is a biologist and president of the Keystone Elk Country Alliance. I assume that’s no relationship to the Keystone pipeline.

It’s supposed to be a great charity that works to conserve Pennsylvania’s beautiful elk population. Rawley, I wish you’d come up and tell us a little bit about your partnership with the energy industry and how it’s been so incredible for American wildlife. Rawley, please. Thank you. Thank you.

MR. COGAN: Thank you, Mr. President. Ladies and gentlemen, don’t let this hat fool you. I’m a born and bred, Pennsylvania-proud country boy.

Energy and conservation — what do they have in common? Strong partnerships and a stewardship ethic. About two hours north of here is a 2 million-acre block of public land. And, by the way, I came down here yesterday in a vehicle powered by compressed natural gas. Yeah.

A 2 million-acre block of public land, two hours north of here, called the Pennsylvania Wilds — it’s the size of Yellowstone National Park. It’s a home to the easternmost wild elk herd in the United States, Pennsylvania’s elk herd.

In my career as an elk biologist, I have worked with this industry for 37 years. We enhanced pipelines. We lined. We fertilized. We mowed. We planted high-quality forage for elk and other wildlife.

Pennsylvania’s elk herd has grown from less than 100 elk in 1982, to over 1,100 elk today. And elk are a big attraction. Thank you. Elk are a major attraction.

The Keystone Elk Country Alliance is a Pennsylvania-based 501(c)(3) wildlife conservation organization. We operate and manage the Elk Country Visitor Center in Benezette. We do that in partnership with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Since opening the Elk Country Visitor Center in September of 2010, we have welcomed over 3.3 million visitors to our front door. Thank you. Those visitors generate $250 million annually in economic development, primarily in food, transportation, and lodging.

The natural gas industry has been a longtime supporter of Pennsylvania’s Elk Country. They have contributed significant dollars to Pennsylvania’s Elk Country and also to the Keystone Elk Country Alliance’s educational programs, as well as our habitat projects.

But most compelling to me are the leaders of this industry — the people I’m looking at right now. They care deeply about our natural resources; I’ve watched it for 37 years. They care deeply about our environment, because it’s who they are. They’re from Pennsylvania, they’re from Ohio, they’re from West Virginia, and they’re from all over this country. They go on vacation in our natural resources. They take their families there. That’s where they go to disconnect. I have all the confidence in the world that they’re going to continue to be good stewards of our environment.

Energy and conservation. There are longstanding partnerships and I value our partnerships. I applaud your conservation ethic. And I am genuinely appreciative of your leadership, making our country energy-independent.

Thank you. And thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you, Rawley. Thank you. Thank you very much, Rawley.

Finally, Bonnie Moore runs a farm in southwest Pennsylvania that has been in her family for more than two centuries. That’s a long time. That is a long time, Bonnie.

Over the years, Bonnie could do nothing but watch as economic decay drained her community of its vitality. It drained her community of its people and its wealth. But now it is springing beautifully back to life. Bonnie, please come up and tell us about what’s going on. Please.

MS. MOORE: I have lived in Washington County, PA, all my life on the Moore homestead. Prior to this administration, the area was declining in jobs and population. The farmers had to work an outside job to support their farms.

After this administration unleashed regulations on the oil and gas industry, our area boomed. We had job growth, supply-chain growth, and the landowners were compensated for allowing the energy companies to use their properties.

As a result, it has helped many landowners, including ourselves. We were able to purchase another adjacent farm with the compensation these energy companies provided, updating buildings and equipment.

I want to thank President Trump and his administration for revitalizing and saving our area and America.

Thank you, Bonnie. See what you’re doing, fellas? What a great job you’re doing. Thank you very much, Bonnie.

A thriving energy industry not only benefits hardworking Americans like Andrea and Rawley and Bonnie, who live in shale country; it’s also an enormous benefit to citizens all across our country, all across our land.

According to the Council of Economic Advisers, who cannot even believe the numbers and the success that we’re having, the astonishing increase in production made possible by shale and the shale revolution saves Americans $203 billion every year, or $2,500 for a family of four in lower electric bills, lower prices, and at the gas pump.

So now you can add that $2,500 on to the $7,000. I think I’m going to do that from now on, if you don’t mind, Mr. Congressman. I think we’re going to do that, because now you add it on, and you’re getting close to $10,000 a year, compared to $400 and to $975. That’s a big difference. I think we have to add it on. We’ll add it on, right? Why not?

But despite these terrific benefits, many politicians in our country are targeting your industry and your jobs for, literally, total destruction. Whether you like it or not, that’s where they’re going. I don’t know; Is it on purpose? Is it stupidity? Is it through evil? How could it be possible that they do this?

Virtually every leading Democrat has pledged to entirely eliminate fossil fuels, wiping out American production of oil, and coal, and natural gas, and, by the way, jobs. These Democrat plans would obliterate millions of American jobs, devastating communities across Pennsylvania and bankrupting families all across our nation. As long as I am your President, that will never, ever even come close to happening — not even a chance. Thank you.

Anti-energy zealots are blinded by ideology. Democrats want to ban shale energy, but shale energy has reduced America’s carbon emissions by 527 million metric tons per year. So what are they doing? A much better record than the European Union, which is always telling us how to do it. We should be telling them how to do it, based on our economy.

The radical policies of Democrats in Congress would result in massive layoffs, exploding energy prices, and a gigantic gift to our foreign adversaries. Oh, they want us to do it so badly, because our businesses would no longer be competitive with their businesses. Some people think that that’s why they come out with all of these schemes.

Our vision is the exact opposite of what they want to do. Our vision is pro-worker, pro-jobs, pro- family, pro-energy, and 100 percent pro-American. Thank you.

We believe the United States should never again be at the mercy of a foreign supplier of energy. We were at their mercy for many, many decades. We are committed not only to energy independence but to American energy dominance.

And the path to that future starts right here in shale country, with all of you — the proud patriots of Pennsylvania and Ohio and West Virginia. You’ve always been loyal to America and I will always be loyal to you. The job you’ve done is incredible.

In every action I take — from defending American energy, to securing American borders, to ending the endless wars — I am fighting for your interest, your families, and your countries above all others. We’re fighting for you. We have to fight for you. And we’re fighting for you — and remember that — above all others. We were calling it, “Make America Great Again.” We’re calling it now, “Keep America Great.” We will keep it going. And finally, as your President, we will always put America first. Thank you.

From the first days of our nation, the true sources of American greatness has always been hardworking, faithful citizens just like you.

The extraordinary workers of this region are the ones who forged the steel that shaped our city skylines, and mined the coal that powered our industries. They farm the fields, man the assembly lines, and loaded those railcars. They gave their best each and every day to build the proudest and mightiest nation the world has ever seen. And we have never been stronger — economically, militarily — than we are right now. Our military has been completely rebuilt.

It was their labor and their sweat that fueled America’s rise. And it’s your sweat and your skill and your soul and your love that are fueling the greatest comeback, by far, in American history. That’s what we’re doing — greatest comeback we’ve ever seen.

We are stronger today than ever before. And we will be even stronger tomorrow. You have to see what we have planned for our great country. Because we are one united team, one united people, and one United States of America.

I will never stop fighting for you because I know that you are the ones who are rebuilding our nation. You are the ones who are restoring our strength. You are the ones renewing our spirit. And you are the ones who are making America greater than it has ever been before. And it’s not even close.

And congratulations to all of you, our great energy people, for what you’ve been able to accomplish, especially in the last three years.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless America.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

33 thoughts on “President Trump’s Speech to the Marcellus Shale Coalition

  1. That speech is amazing. How anyone with any common sense, or any love for this country and what it stands for, could vote against Pres. Trump is beyond belief. His economic record is almost so vast that it can’t even be comprehended. Partisan hatred seems to overwhelm common sense every time. We in gas country have a duty to get these facts out because we can say good by to our economic accomplishments, if we lose Pres. Trump

  2. MR.PRESIDENT: YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN NE PA SPECIFICALLY WAYNE COUNTY.WE HAVE LOTS OF NAT GAS.HOWEVER WE AREN’T PERMITTED TO DRILL FOR IT BY A ROGUE FEDERAL STATE COMMISSION “DRBC”.YOU ARE MEMBER OF THAT COMMITTEE!!! WE NEED YOUR HELP.YOU ALREADY HAVE OUR HELP “FOUR MORE YEARS. GIVE THEM HELL IN 2020.

  3. You have two guys from Queens. One speaks to the people, the other AT the people. One puts out all the choices on the table for the people to freely choose, the other doesn’t. Instead he gets all uppity and takes the ball home. Which one would you rather have as a leader?? Because one of them certainly isn’t. 🙂

  4. He should come to Dimock & see the bogus, nonfunctional,disgusting “treatment system “ that goes against Dep regulations!

  5. Factsrtold: got an address? How about a DEP case number that anyone can look up on the DEP web site? Who provided the treatment system? What DEP regulation do you mean when you say “goes against Dep regulations!”

    What action have you take with your local politicians (town supervisor, mayor, county government, DEP, state legislative reps, EPA)?

    You are making assertions and have not provided any facts. Makes it hard to do any research to support your claims . . . . .

    • Barry. If you are so interested and are actually a real, knowledgeable, person who is not one of the anti nuts. It may be possible for me to arrange for you to actually see for yourself and to speak with the homeowners. You would need to be accompanied by Tom and or Vic for the homeowners safety.

  6. Easy to support her claims..
    Tom knows who she is and has visited her.
    She is on Carter Rd , Dimock.
    One of the original contaminated water wells from Cabot drilling near her..
    And Cabot supplied the water treatment system in an outside shed.
    And supplies her bottled water.

    • Vera,

      Not “easy to support her claims” when you provide no data. As I recall, a small number of families refused to settle and the DEP made Cabot supply water and water filtration systems, and at some point (2013, maybe?) DEP determined that Cabot had completed all previously required actions.

      Let me repeat myself: How about a DEP case number that anyone can look up on the DEP web site? Who provided the treatment system? What DEP regulation did Factsrtold mean when she said “goes against Dep regulations!”

      What actions have been taken with your local politicians (town supervisor, mayor, county government, DEP, state legislative reps, EPA)? I’m willing to review information from the DEP web site and other on-line resources, but I need a starting point.

      • If I had a case number I’d be happy to provide it.

        Whomever claims drinking water is provided if full of s***.

        You can read Dep regulations and see what they say should be done. Unfortunately it wasn’t.

        Politicians don’t care.

        Dep & gas co refuse to meet with us.

        You can also look up the Gw vistas/methane migration study.

        You can also look at the Epa power point.

        I’m sure Tom and Vic both have opinions they may share but won’t post.

        Oh and Tom why is it when I post things they very often don’t appear? Why is it when posts are made I am never notified? I’m sure I can guess the name(s) of the people controlling it.

        • My information comes from The Second Modification to Consent Order and Agreement dated November 4, 2009, with the date of the second modification being July 19, 2010, between the DEP and Cabot Oil. The first modification to the initial agreement was signed in April 15, 2010.

          I assume that you live in the “Affected Area” in Dimock and/or Springsville Township.

          Cabot was ordered to plug three wells, and bring another well into compliance with the Oil and gas Act. These actions were completed by Jun 21, 2010.

          Cabot was also required to “permanently restore and/or replace the Affected Water Supplies by completing the installations of whole house treatment systems for the Affected Water Supplies within 30 days.”

          In May 2010 DEP staff meet with several residents with Affected Water Supplies. The residents appealed the decision to have Cabot install whole-house treatment systems. DEP ordered that “Cabot shall continue to provide and maintain temporary potable water and/or gas mitigation devices for all of the Affected Water Supplies.”

          Cabot was given 60 days (from July 2010) to “permanently restore and/or replace all of the Affected Water Supplies in accordance with Section 208 of the Oil and Gas Act” (and several other parts of the State Code).

          This documentation was signed by DEP and Cabot reps.

          If Cabot didn’t do what they were supposed to, I would have expected DEP would continue to stomp on them.

          I don’t know the details of which address Vera was talking about, and the individual names and addresses of the DEP reports I’ve found have been redacted for privacy.

          It’s entirely possible that relevant information is available on the DEP web site, but I have not been able to locate it.

          I also do not have enough information to understand why at least some of the residents did not like the technology solution Cabot proposed. It sounds like some people accepted it, and some did not.

          I’ve looked at a number of USGS studies that demonstrate a lot of methane migration at shallow depths, including areas like Pike County where there’s been no drilling. I don’t know if your water quality problems are methane, or methane plus other stuff, or not methane but other stuff.

          I’m a real person, a NY resident and land owner who is interested in figuring out facts from hype. I’ve got degrees in nuclear engineering and operations analysis, and worked for the US Navy in both active duty military and civilian roles. Vera provides endless noise and very few facts, so I ask her to back up her assertions. I provide references, she provides noise. My goal is not to hassle folks with real issues.

          • Barry
            Your quote:
            Cabot was given 60 days (from July 2010) to “permanently restore and/or replace all of the Affected Water Supplies in accordance with Section 208 of the Oil and Gas Act” (and several other parts of the State Code).

            This documentation was signed by DEP and Cabot reps.

            How did Dep decide upon the “method”?

            How much research did Dep do on/about the “method”?

            How much knowledge did Dep have about the “method”?

            Was this done in the time frame?
            Was it done in accordance with leases and addendums?
            Was it done at all?
            Perhaps you can define both terms
            Permanently Restore and Permanently Replace.?
            Who should be financially responsible for “Permanently Restoring and or Permanently Replacing?”
            Who would need to agree upon the method used?
            Who would need to agree it was done?
            Who would need to agree it works?
            I’m sure everyone is waiting for your reply. I can’t wait to pass it onto the homeowners.

    • Vera
      How is it you obtain the inaccurate information about drinking water and maintenance? The homeowners would like to know who is providing you with the bs. Perhaps your source needs to learn the truth and stop telling lies

  7. Debbie, so what is the truth?

    Did not Cabot install and maintain the treatment system in the shed for a time and deliver bottled water to you for a time?
    So, now they don’t…

    Cabot is still delivering water to some and maintaining their water buffaloes.

  8. Factsrtold:

    in response to your questions – –

    “How did Dep decide upon the “method”?

    How much research did Dep do on/about the “method”?

    How much knowledge did Dep have about the “method”?

    Was this done in the time frame?
    Was it done in accordance with leases and addendums?
    Was it done at all?

    “Perhaps you can define both terms
    Permanently Restore and Permanently Replace.?
    Who should be financially responsible for “Permanently Restoring and or Permanently Replacing?”
    Who would need to agree upon the method used?
    Who would need to agree it was done?
    Who would need to agree it works?
    I’m sure everyone is waiting for your reply. I can’t wait to pass it onto the homeowners.”

    I don’t have any access to the people or processes involved in these decisions. I only have access to materials I can locate in public records (like the DEP web site) after the fact.

    I don’t work for DEP (or anyone else in PA), and the material I cited was either copied directly from the Second Modification or paraphrased slightly to reduce the word count.

    This link appears to be a follow-on Consent Order and Settlement Agreement (dated Dec 15 2010). I previously cited the Second Modification to Consent Order and Agreement dated November 4, 2009, with the date of the second modification being July 19, 2010, between the DEP and Cabot Oil. The first modification to the initial agreement was signed in April 15, 2010.

    http://files.dep.state.pa.us/OilGas/OilGasLandingPageFiles/FinalCO&A121510.pdf

    To recap the timeline for these orders/agreements:

    Initial order: Nov 4, 2009
    1st Modification: April 15, 2010
    2nd Modification: July 19, 2010 (the April and July orders became known as the “Modified 2009 Agreement)
    Consent order and settlement agreement: Dec 15, 2010.

    This Consent Order required Cabot to furnish whole house treatment systems, creation of an escrow account to provide funding for the operating and/or and maintenance to restore or replace the affected water supply. Cabot was required to continue water sampling at regular intervals until enough data was collected to meet the requirements of the Consent Order.

    This morning I also found http://files.dep.state.pa.us/OilGas/BOGM/BOGMPortalFiles/OilGasReports/Determination_Letters/EAST/CO258482-11_Redacted.pdf

    which includes the Dec 15 2010 Consent Order and an additional letter, dated Feb 8, 2019 which is a response to a Water Supply Request for Investigation, Dimock Township. This letter is redacted, so I don’t know if it’s relevant to your situation. The letter does review data on water samples collected since Nov 2008.

    The concluding paragraph says:

    “Based on its investigation, the Department has determined that the impacts to your Water Supply were temporary and that the concentrations of methane in your Water Supply is now consistent with expected background conditions. In addition, as noted above, the treatment system previously installed on your Water Supply and available for your use has the ability to address the manganese when in operation. As a result the Department does not plan to require further action regarding the Water Supply.”

    The letter also says “Please contact Michael O’Donnell at 570.346.5530 should you have any questions concerning this matter.” and is signed by Jenniffer W. Means, Environmental program Manager, Eastern Oil and Gas District.

    Since the enclosures with the lab results are not included in the file, I don’t have access to the entire data set.

    I’m sorry I don’t have more information about how these events evolved. I’ve provided links to the information I did find. I searched for the GW vistas methane migration study, but was unable to locate a specific study that was related to Dimock.

    I did locate and download the EPA study Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States (EPA-600-R-16-236Fa, Dec 2016) https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/hfstudy/recordisplay.cfm?deid=332990 (executive Summmary and Main Report are both available here)

    “Site-specific cases of alleged impacts on underground drinking water resources during the well injection stage of the hydraulic fracturing water cycle are particularly challenging to understand (e.g., methane migration in Dimock, Pennsylvania; the Raton Basin of Colorado; and Parker County, Texas). This is because the subsurface environment is complex and belowground fluid movement is not directly observable. In cases of alleged impacts, activities in the hydraulic fracturing water cycle may be one of several causes of impacts, including other oil and gas activities, other industries, and natural processes.”

    In Text Box 6-2, which focuses on Dimock, we find
    “Several studies in this and surrounding areas have focused on the geochemistry of the groundwater, in particular on gas composition, and noble and natural gas isotopes in the water. Results are consistent with an accumulation of stray gas originating from greater depth and moving to the Catskill Formation. However, the identity of the geologic formation(s) sourcing the natural gas is not always certain and may be consistent with sourcing from either the Marcellus or the intervening geologic formations. The role of hydraulic fracturing in the migration of gas to the Catskill Formation, and the specific pathways by which this migration occurred, is even less certain. Some investigators suspect that the initial gas well construction allowed natural gases from deeper formations to move upward along uncemented wellbores. However, no publicly available information exists to document whether hydraulic fracturing may have aided fluid movement along wellbores to enter drinking water resources from greater depths.”

    We know that Cabot had problems with well casings and was directed to plug four wells and fix cement casings at 18 other wells.

    Text Box 6-3 discusses Stray Gas Migration: “Stray gas refers to the phenomenon of natural gas (primarily methane) migrating into shallow drinking water resources, into water wells or other types of wells, to the surface, or to near-surface features (e.g., basements, streams, or springs). The source of the migrating gas can be natural gas reservoirs (either conventional or unconventional), or from coal mines, landfills, leaking gas wells, leaking gas pipelines, buried organic matter, or natural microbial processes”

    To me, the EPA report indicates that methane in fresh water sources can be present as a result of the local geography whether there’s been any oil and gas drilling, and that methane in fresh water can come from leaking well casings or migration from deeper depths.

    • Glad you know how to read. Unfortunately without any first hand knowledge, experience, or information you don’t have the truth and you can’t always believe what you read. Especially from the source you have. It’s a waste of time and energy trying to explain things to you and some others. You could file a rtk request and maybe things won’t be hidden from you or maybe they will. You don’t seem to be aware of the incident in Feb 2019 either. As I said before if you would like to learn the truth it’s possible the homeowners would speak to you and show you but for their safety Tom and or Vic would need to come too. Since Bill DeRosiers writes articles you can bring him too apparently he doesn’t always remember all the facts. Or maybe Tom and or Vic can/will fill you in.

      • I provided the sources I used. You tell me that my lack of first hand knowledge, experience or information means I don’t have the truth, given the source I used.

        As a person with an engineering and analytic background, I tend to believe a source that provides lab results and documentation of events . . . . . facts.

        Sorry that you don’t provide data. Conversations are not facts.

        I don’t actually have the right to know (if that’s what “rtk”) means. I’m not aware of the details of the “incident in Feb 2019” but it may be related to the DEP letter I cited above.

        Please recall that my initial input to this thread was to challenge Vera to provide sources to back up her nonsensical claims.

        I have no legal or regulatory authority to compel anyone to do anything. It appears from the documentation that I’ve found that those who do have legal and regulatory authorities have acted with due diligence. You do not wish to provide material to support a different conclusion.

        I have no wish to do anything that might threaten anyone’s safety, so consider me done contributing to this thread.

        I will continue to challenge Vera (and others like her) on this and other web sites who repeatedly make inflammatory claims with zero verifiable references.

        • Shame you have no desire to learn the truth.

          What happened here should never have happened. Had people properly conducted themselves it wouldn’t have happened.

          Something needs to be done so this never happens again and nothing like this ever happens to anyone ever again. Someone needs to stand up for the residence and property owners in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (it is actually supposed to be a commonwealth) and everywhere else.

          My opinion many Dep officials/employees didn’t/don’t and aren’t doing their “jobs”. They among others should be fired and lose all pensions, benefits, etc. People who will actually do the “job” they are paid to do should be hired. These are Employees of the State of Pennsylvania the Commonwealth they are paid to protect the citizens, families, water, air, properties, etc. It’s about time they start doing the “jobs” they are paid to do.

          My opinion These persons who were “just learning” and claims “the gas company can police themselves” should be the first Dep employees Fired.

          • I was going to stop, but . . . . I keep asking for data, and all I get are assertions with no supporting data.

            I cite sources, and you respond with opinions.

            Good luck with your future endeavors.

  9. Barry, why can’t Cabot still drill or frack in the 9 sq.miles in Dimock…
    if Cabot satisfied all the DEP requirements?

    Cabot is still delivering water in that area per DEP requirements and testing the water wells in that area..

    • Vera,

      what documentation do you have to back up your assertion that

      “Cabot is still delivering water in that area per DEP requirements and testing the water wells in that area..”

      I believe Cabot made two fundamental mistakes when they started work in and around Dimock.

      First, they made mistakes on well casing installations and the cement used. DEP made Cabot plug some wells, fix the casings on others, and required Cabot to provide repeated test results to demonstrate that these problems had been fixed.

      Second, Cabot put the wells too close together. It may be that at the time, Cabot (and possibly other companies) did not realize that with horizontal drilling it would be possible to use one vertical well bore to support several horizontal runs. And we know that over time the horizontal drilling capability was improved to allow much longer runs. Without this information, Cabot put the wells closer together than was necessary. I expect that today, no drilling is going on in Dimock not because of the DEP but because there’s no need to. As you point out, the affected area as defined by the DEP is 9 square miles. Check Google Earth . . . . . I don’t think there’s any room for more wells. And Cabot may have decided they didn’t need the hassle. . . . . they are getting gas from existing well, so why provide an opportunity for mistakes in such a highly politicized area?

      Are you still prohibited from trespassing on Cabot property?

  10. Then Debbie, connect with us also who expose and stand for the safety of the land, water and residents and not just reach out to the gas-lovers.
    Join with us as we give evidence to the on-going State government investigation of all this.

    • Vera, are you going to answer my questions?

      You don’t expose anything, Vera. You make claims, provide zero facts, and can’t or won’t answer questions.

  11. Call Dep office in Scranton.
    And they will tell you about the prohibition on Cabot.

    It’s in the 2010 DEP consent order.

    I am prohibited permanently with Cabot to stay 100 feet from their installations…

    • Vera,

      I assume you are referring to the Consent order and settlement agreement: Dec 15, 2010, which is available at

      http://files.dep.state.pa.us/OilGas/BOGM/BOGMPortalFiles/OilGasReports/Determination_Letters/EAST/CO258482-11_Redacted.pdf

      Part of that Consent Order reads:

      “d. After April 15, 2011, Cabot may complete the drilling of any of the Dimock/Carter Road Gas Wells, and/or may begin the drilling of any New Gas Wells within the Dimock/Carter Road Area only upon receipt of written notice from the Department that, as to said Gas Well or Wells:

      i. Cabot is in compliance with all of its obligations under Paragraph 5, below;

      ii. Cabot is, as of the date Cabot proposes to drill said Gas Well or Wells, in compliance with the applicable requirements of Paragraph 3.a., above, including obtaining all required permits or other authorization from the Department; and

      iii. Cabot is in compliance with all other obligations under this Consent order and Settlement Agreement as of the data Cabot plans to drill said Gas Well or Well(s).

      That indicates that Cabot could gain permission. Don’t know if they ever did.

    • Vera,

      Take a look at

      http://www.depreportingservices.state.pa.us/ReportServer/Pages/ReportViewer.aspx?%2fOil_Gas%2fOil_Gas_Well_Production

      and pull the data from Susquehanna County for August 2019.

      Cabot is currently operating 31 gas wells within the Dimock/Carter Road Area (defined as being between 41-45N and 41-42-14N, -75-54-11 and -75-50-48). 15 of the wells were drilled in 2008, 15 in 2009, and 1 in 2010. One of the 31 is listed as abandoned, one is listed as “well temporarily not producing”, and the 29 other wells delivered 382,771 Mcf of natural gas in August 2019.

      It would appear that Cabot didn’t have any need to do any additional drilling in the Dimock/Carter Road area after 2010.

  12. Perhaps the gas co and dep should actually come out and speak to property owners instead of hiding behind their desks and badges and their high priced bullying lying lawyers. Stop saying a meeting would be unproductive) The only reason it would be unproductive is because maybe what you have done and continue to do would be shown./exposed. It’s bs to tell property owners they agreed to things they didn’t and expecting them to hire attorneys to get information they are entitled to. Both companies need to stop telling lies! It appears regulations aren’t and haven’t been followed neither are leases. It’s about time they actually Fix all the problems They both caused. We the people of Pennsylvania have and continue to be victimized.

  13. Pingback: Trump Talks Energy Progress at the New York Economic ClubNatural Gas Now

  14. Pingback: Energy & Blue Collar Boom: Trump Lays It Out at World Economic ForumNatural Gas Now

  15. Pingback: Climate Crisis Committee of U.S. House Makes War on Energy ConsumersNatural Gas Now

  16. Pingback: Energy Dominance Is Being Restored Says President TrumpNatural Gas Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *