Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Constitution Pipeline Answers Enemies Demanding Surrender with “NUTS”

delaware riverkeeper - Jim Willis reportsJim Willis
Editor & Publisher, Marcellus Drilling News (MDN)

 

The Constitution Pipeline asks FERC to rehear their challenge of NYS-DEC’s denial of water quality certification even as it pursues other remedies.

Contrary to stories begin spun by anti-fossil fuel groups, Williams has not given up the fight to build the Constitution Pipeline, a $683 million, 124-mile pipeline from Susquehanna County, PA to Schoharie County, NY to move Marcellus gas into New York State and from there, into New England. The pipeline faces stiff odds.

In 2016, the Andrew Cuomo-corrupted NY Dept. of Environmental Conservation (DEC) abrogated their fiduciary duty by denying the project a federal stream crossing permit. Williams sued the state in federal court, and lost. Williams then asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to overrule DEC’s rejection. Sadly, last month FERC denied that request. Williams has since launched a multi-pronged legal attack with three potential paths to victory. First, Williams appealed the case directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The case to the Supremes takes up the issue of whether or not one state, like New York, can deny a federal project that benefits other states, like the New England states. We await word from the Supremes on whether or not they will hear the case.

Yesterday Williams launched another legal attack by asking FERC to reconsider their denial from last month. If FERC says yes and overrules the DEC, we have victory. If FERC says no, Williams will then (we are assuming) use the denial as the basis to take the case back to federal court–this time to the D.C. Court of Appeals.

The first federal court to consider the matter (ruling against Williams) was the Second Court of Appeals (in NY). Moving the case to the D.C. court stands a better chance. So, three potential paths to victory: U.S. Supreme Court, FERC changes its mind, or the D.C. Court of Appeals. This fight is far from over.

A consortium behind the proposed Constitution natural gas pipeline from Pennsylvania to New York asked U.S. federal energy regulators on Monday to review their order related to a water quality permit that had been denied for the project.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Jan. 11 rejected the request by Constitution Pipeline, a consortium headed by Williams Cos, to overturn New York’s denial of the water permit.

“New York failed to act within ‘a reasonable period of time’ on Constitution’s application,” Constitution said in a statement.

If built, the 125-mile (201-km) pipeline would transport 0.65 billion cubic feet per day of shale gas. New York uses on average about 3.6 bcfd of gas, and one bcfd is enough to fuel about 5 million U.S. homes.

Constitution is owned by subsidiaries of Williams, Cabot Oil & Gas, Duke Energy and WGL Holdings.

Officials at Williams could not immediately say what the latest cost estimate was for the project. The company said it would take about 10 to 12 months to build the pipeline after receiving necessary approvals.

When Williams proposed building Constitution in 2013, it estimated it would cost about $683 million and enter service in 2016. The delays, however, have boosted that estimate to as high as $875 million, according to upstate New York newspapers.

Williams filed with FERC to build the project in 2013. FERC first approved construction of the project in 2014 and then again in 2016, conditioned on other approvals.

The New York Department of Environmental Conservation denied Constitution’s application in 2016, saying the company failed to provide sufficient information to determine whether the project would comply with the state’s water quality standards.

Constitution appealed the New York denial to a federal appeals court, but the court last year upheld the state decision. The company in January petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the appeal court’s ruling.

Williams’ request to FERC, filed yesterday:

Click to read the full Williams’ request to FERC

Editor’s Note: Readers puzzled by the unusual headline to this post should research the Battle of Bastogne and General McAuliffe’s famous reply to the German demand for surrender of American troops. My father-in-law, Edward A. O’Neill was part of the force that rescued Bastogne. It was among his most precious memories and stories of the war in which he served. 

For more great articles on natural gas development every single business day, subscribe to Marcellus Drilling News using this convenient link.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

6 thoughts on “Constitution Pipeline Answers Enemies Demanding Surrender with “NUTS”

  1. Your buddy the oddly-named “Constitution” Pipeline, lost. It should either get over it, or, next best, report it to its mommy. Perhaps its mommy will give it a pacifier for when it gets the news that it will have to REPLACE the trees of the Holleran/Zeffer PROPERTY.

  2. 3.25 million potential customers should from a class and intervene in the litigation. 3.25 million pacifiers and a lot of mommies to bring to the table. If only the end users, party to this discussion, had a voice. In the vain of SNL, never mind … the potential 3.25 million Federal tax payers are represented by FERC.

  3. We are buying LNG from the Russians so that they can surreptitiously finance more anti-pipeline fervor! When will the FBI be proving Russian collusion with the Greens?

  4. When they’re done planting trees at the Hollerans they can come to my property and rebuild my bluestone cliffs they bulldozed and I thought that out!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads