Jim Willis
Editor & Publisher, Marcellus Drilling News (MDN)
Fractivist bullying seems to be the order of the day but, fortunately, some are learning to stand up to these intimidation tactics and say enough already.
The demands of anti-drillers in Lebanon County, PA are illustrative of their true motivations. Two different anti groups – Lebanon Pipeline Awareness and Concerned Citizens of Lebanon County – are demanding Lebanon County commissioners have an open public meeting with two pipeline companies. The two pipeline companies are Williams (Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline) and Sunoco Logistics Partners (Mariner East 1 & 2 pipelines). Revealing their real objectives, these frantic and frenzied fractivists have said that If the meeting is not open and public, so they can pummel representatives of the companies in public and have it broadcast everywhere – they want no meeting at all.
Williams and Sunoco had agreed to non-public meetings that include members of these two groups – to answer their questions. But the pipeline companies, and the county commissioners, don’t want a circus. That means no cameras/media, and the meeting is not open so it can be packed by large numbers of antis putting on a show for the cameras.

The companies are willing to sit down and talk like adults and answer questions and address concerns – also like adults. But, that’s not what Lebanon Pipeline Awareness nor Concerned Citizens of Lebanon County really want. They want to behave like petulant children throwing a temper tantrum for everyone to witness. Instead of taking the private meeting, they (the antis) want no meeting at all. Here’s the evidence, from the Lebanon Daily News (emphasis added):
Several months ago, Lebanon Pipeline Awareness members asked the commissioners to request public meetings with Sunoco Logisitics and Williams Partners, which are both subsidiaries of Energy Transfer Equity.
Sunoco is retrofitting its existing 350-mile Mariner East 1 Pipeline and adding at least one parallel pipeline to carry natural gas products from the Marcellus Shale gas region of the state through parts of Lebanon County to its distribution point near Philadelphia.
Williams Partners is seeking permission from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to build the 183-mile Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline, which also would carry natural gas products through parts of the county to its distribution points on the East Coast.
Both companies agreed to the meetings but with conditions. Namely, that the media would not be welcome, and that instead of a public meeting, it would include only the commissioners, relevant county department heads and a select number of representatives from Lebanon Pipeline Awareness and Concerned Citizens of Lebanon County, another pipeline opponent.
In October, the commissioners agreed to accept those conditions and began making arrangements to set dates for the meetings.
On Thursday, Michael Schroeder and Ann Pinca of Lebanon Pipeline Awareness told the commissioners they had reservations about moving forward with the meeting under the conditions set by the pipeline companies…
The commissioners suggested asking the companies to include the media or, in the alternative, to hold a press briefing after the meeting…
“We certainly don’t have some weapon that we can tell these two pipeline companies they have to have an open public meeting,” Ames said. “I think, in all honesty, you folks are looking for an opportunity to challenge these folks at a public meeting and so on. You’ve had some of those along the way. I’m not sure it is our obligation to create another venue where that can happen.”
…Ames suggested the group could prepare pertinent landowners’ questions ahead of the private meeting.
“They would answer those questions and they would become part of the public record without the shouting match, the theatrics of the whole thing, which I think would be wonderful,” he said…
Commissioner Bob Phillips reiterated that the pipeline companies have no obligation to hold a public meeting, put the meeting on pubic record, or meet any demands made by the commissioners.
“I’m just saying if we go the path of, ‘Here’s what we require in order to have a meeting,’ and they say no, then we are saying there is no meeting. And I think that is worse than having a restricted meeting,” he said.
Commissioner Jo Ellen Litz agreed, stating she felt the county should go forward with meeting company representatives for the benefit of directors in departments like the Emergency Management Agency, Tax Assessment and Geographical Information Systems.
But the anti-pipeline group was adamant that it was an open meeting or no meeting at all.
“That is our position,” Schroeder said. “Unless this is a genuinely public event, either with the press present or the public-at-large, then the restrictions are too onerous.”
…Ultimately, Phillips said, that would be counter-productive to Lebanon Pipeline Awareness’ goal of providing information about the pipeline projects to the public.
“I just don’t see what the gain is,” he said. “If you get 60 percent of what you want in something, that sometimes is better than 100 percent of nothing.”*
These antis are not serious people and should not be taken seriously. They’re childish and it’s time to stop coddling them like 3-year old brats. Enough fractivist bullying already!
Editor’s Note: Amen to Jim’s final observation! What the commissioners fail to grasp in this case, though, is this; the antis aren’t at all interested in “providing information about the pipeline projects to the public.” They have zero interest in that and want only the opportunity to engage in theatrics, to create some news and build a public impression of momentum on their side. Therefore, no media present meant getting 0 percent of what they wanted.
Which is why Maya van Rossum of the Delaware Riverkeeper and her William Penn Foundation allies from the Clean Air Council tried this little maneuver with John Quigley (their erstwhile ally at PennFuture) and had the cameras there to record it, of course:
This brings us to the bigger point, of course, which is that fractivist bullying succeeds when the bullied honor, or are misled to believe in, the good intentions of the ones doing the bullying. Bullies tend not to be characterized by good intentions. Politicians often choose to ignore that fact – it’s easier that way – but stopping the bullying means calling it out for what it is and we need a whole lot more of that.
For more great articles on the subject of natural gas development every single day, subscribe to Marcellus Drilling News using this convenient link.


obviously…. I MEAN VERY OBVIOUSLY THE COMMENTS MUST BE WRITTEN ON TOILET PAPER AS THE BOXES APPEAR TO BE VERY EMPTY. WATCH HOW THEY BOUNCE AND HOW EASY THEY’RE HELD UP BY THE MIS-LEADING PROTESTORS
I’ve got to agree with Mr. Furman, those boxes seem mighty light. But Mr. Willis, this isn’t bullying; it’s just a predictable, scripted charade to get media attention. It’s a shame there’s no video of them “straining” to move their props from the curb shot to the meeting room.
Let van Rossum have her little fake tantrum and props, then expose and ridicule them. Save the good stuff for when she really goes over the line, like Scroggins did. We don’t have to exaggerate or inflate anything, nor should we.
Excellent points!!!
I wonder why they even posted this video as their own. Anyone on the fence could see through this charade (clearly the boxes are empty or filled with their own “hot air”) and say to themselves, “Do I really want to be associated with this Drama Club?”
As Grouch Marx is credited in saying “I wouldn’t join a club that would have me as a member”.
I could not agree more with this statement by the editor: “What the commissioners fail to grasp in this case, though, is this; the antis aren’t at all interested in “providing information about the pipeline projects to the public.”
I can say that I have seen first hand that providing misinformation is more accurately the mission of certain anti-pipeline groups as it appears to simply be seen as a strategy or tactic.
Who then is the public going to get their information about the pipeline projects from because often the media is getting their information also from the activists?
I think a long list of media contacts should be on stakeholder lists and notices from pipeline companies for all projects. Reporters command of what FERC is, what the process involves, permits, timelines, dockets is severely lacking. Reporters don’t appear to know who is or isn’t a valid source for information and sometimes even what they are talking about. It is the media that is in the best position to provide the public at the very least the facts on these proposals, whether controversial or not, and they are failing miserably at this.
I see no reason why certain meetings with companies outside of public arena cannot occur nor that they are or should be seen as controversial. I attended one myself with Williams in NYC with the rockaway pipeline project.
http://www.nbcnews.com/pages/texas-pipeline
If you don’t believe the media has an inability to understand what the FERC process it and what it involves, for example one of the first things is that they do not in fact oversee pipeline safety regulations, all you have to do is read just a few pipeline projects stories and you will get it. This one by nbc with a whole team of folks it seems is but one example. Apparently knowing what you are writing about pales into comparison to writing phrases like…” for those who live there,the silence of wide-open space is law.” Maybe nbc just doesn’t realize that every pipeline project is opposed and thinks the Trans Peco controversy is unusual? It’s not. Not at this point in time. And the media also fails to make the connection to fracking and often instead makes a connection to the Keystone pipeline as if every pipeline group was inspired by the keystone xl fight.
I wonder why there wasn’t a whole team at nbc or whereever writing about the Sierrita pipeline project also approved and then constructed to deliver to mexico not so long ago? I guess pipeline fighting stories weren’t as trendy then?
http://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/eis/2014/03-28-14-eis.asp
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20141031005619/en/Kinder-Morgan-Places-Sierrita-Pipeline-Service-Provide
The media is simply way behind the times.
This is another instance of ‘The Ithacans’ and their ilk knowing what is so good for the rest of us that it must be crammed down the throats of ‘The Local Yokels’, whom they disdain for their supposed ignorance.
But there is occasional push-back from The Locals, and an excellent example of it came out in Watkins Glen recently in that LPG-Storage controversy. There, the head of the union at US Salt wrote a letter openly making fun of the ‘expertises’ of the anti-group, Gas Free Seneca. That excellent letter may be viewed at The Ithaca Journal’s site here: http://www.ithacajournal.com/story/opinion/readers/2015/09/24/letter-gas-opponents-hurting-community/72743208/