How Will Upstate NY Ever Survive Corruptocrat and Company?

cost of renewables - Tom ShepstoneTom Shepstone
Natural Gas NOW


Andrew Cuomo a/k/a Gov. Corruptocrat, aided by a spineless Senate, is killing Upstate NY by throwing money at boondoggles while denying it a ready remedy.

Just how is that Upstate NY is supposed to survive the debacle that is Andrew “Corruptocrat” Cuomo and a mostly Upstate NY Republican Senate that enables him every step of the way? No clearer evidence exists of the state of corruption that is the Empire State than the continuing political freak show that is New York’s economic development program under Cuomo.

Billion after billion, indictment after indictment and failure after failure, Cuomo’s strategy has been one of choosing winners poorly and making a loser out of the one thing that would have made a huge positive difference. That was, of course, natural gas development and it needed none of his help, which its precisely why he felt no remorse in killing it for the sake of appeasing the NRDC gang.

Upstate NY

Corruptocrat celebrates his death blow to Upstate NY with small band of fractivists – Wall Street Journal

Corruptocrat’s abysmal failure at economic development has come into sharper focus recently with two editorials in the New York Post. Last Friday, the Post explained the New York State Legislature’s latest attempt at picking winners and losers in a way that inevitably steer contributions to Cuomo campaigns. Titled “Signing These Bills Would Just License More Corruption,” it noted the following (emphasis added):

New York’s “economic development” programs are a joke — spending that rewards a few connected insiders while rarely delivering much real growth, let alone jobs. But the Legislature keeps trying to launch new ones

As the Citizens Budget Commission notes, “No new [‘development’] programs should be approved until reforms are put in place to improve evaluation, procurement and disclosure requirements and existing spending is effectively evaluated.”

One bill would create “innovation vouchers” for small firms that partner with colleges, government labs and public research institutes. Another would allow $100,000 in new grants to small businesses doing energy and environmental work.

It’s as if the Buffalo Billion program weren’t mired in a rigged-bidding scandal.

A third bill would give tax credits to film and TV companies that hire women and minority writers and directors. Is that supposed to make up for the hundreds of thousands in taxpayer funds that went to Harvey Weinstein productions?

New York spends $8 billion a year on economic development. Until the state can produce hard evidence it knows what it’s doing, adding new programs is simply corrupt.

The Post followed this up the next day with another editorial titled “Cuomo’s Latest ‘Economic Development’ Implosion” that excoriates Corruptocrat for his failures:

The self-inflicted hits just keep coming to Gov. Cuomo’s upstate “economic development” schemes, thanks to a combination of corruption and grandiose but flawed planning.

The state Public Authorities Control Board has again opted to hold up a $38.5 million loan (i.e., bailout) to SUNY Polytechnic, which needs the cash to pay the mortgage on its NanoFab X building.

Problem is, one of the two anchor tenants has pulled up stakes (as it was scheduled to do after five years), with no replacement in sight…

It’s just the latest in a long line of state-funded projects that promised loads of jobs for struggling upstaters but produced precious little.

Like the Central New York Film Hub, which was supposed to bring 350 jobs to Onondaga but now sits empty. Or a $600 million Utica plant for Ams AG, which pulled out after it opened. And, of course, Buffalo’s Solar City plant, built with $750 million in taxpayer funds for an industry in decline.

The few success stories don’t make up for the jobs lost because of Cuomo’s fracking ban.

And, this list doesn’t even include the soured yogurt deals that were supposed to rescue Upstate NY or dozens of other smaller boondoggle projects that should never have been funded with taxpayer money. Corruptocrat, of course, had an opportunity to do the right thing and stimulate real economic development by simply allowing fracking with no subsidies required. He chose otherwise because there was no graft to be had, there was the NRDC gang to be appeased and there was a Republican Senate that loves picking winners and losers and doing inconsequential things like throwing money at universities.

How well I recall being at an event in Oneonta five years ago when Republican State Senator James Seward, a “go along to get along” guy if there ever was one, offered a crowd of angry landowner constituents his alternative to fracking as a lift for Upstate NY. It was an “economic summit.” It was laughable.

The silliness of such a suggestion capsulized the total ineffectiveness of even Upstate NY legislators of the opposite party in confronting Corruptocrat’s failed stategy. They have no interest in doing it; they’d rather do a meaningless talkfest. That is to say they’d rather talk down those who want real economic development than offend a corrupt governor. They’d rather support colleges doing more political correctness than science.

Upstate NY

Meanwhile, though, at least one of those universities is showing us just how meaningless all that talk and political correctness really is. We’re told, in this Buffalo News article, the University at Buffalo is investing in fracking as it talks sustainability, in fact. The writer, of course, thinks the sin is the investing in fracking, not the vapid talk about sustainability. But, we know better, don’t we? The sustainability pablum is spewed by those with no responsibilities for producing energy, food or wealth. Rather, they’re paid to talk and the more politically correct the talk, the more it’s valued in the conformist world of the university culture. Moreover, as one reader writes, “So, when will UB stop graduating geologists and engineers who work in fossil fuel fields?”

Those with the fiduciary responsibility to ensure the continuation of the university itself and its ability to pay its faculty have to take a much more serious approach, though. They have to act and act wisely. They’ve chosen to invest in fracking because it is the future, just as China is doing. Sadly, New York State’s leadership lacks such wisdom or the courage to employ it, even as it, too, uses ever more natural gas and reaps the rewards of cleaner air. It prefers to starve Upstate NY out of existence, making a wilderness for the NRDC gang to enjoy.

It didn’t start with Corruptocrat either. It was a previous governor, for example, who loaned Empire State Development funds, intended for economic development, to the Open Space Institutute to expand that wilderness. Andrew Cuomo is just carrying on a tradition of abandoning Upstate NY to the wolves. He’s simply taken things to new levels of corruption and incompetence, making me wonder how Upstate NY will ever survive him.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 thoughts on “How Will Upstate NY Ever Survive Corruptocrat and Company?

  1. Your remarks are very accurate.Seward is at the beck and call of the Cooperstown elite. Meanwhile the landowners struggle while sitting on a valuable asset. Its so sad.


    Speaking of NRDC I find it curious that blogposts from them appear under the news category via a Google search. Also isn’t someone from nrdc on the new jersey governor elects transition team along with Jeff tittell another big natural gas pipeline resister who much like the people in the photograph on this post (Jessica roff and Eric weltman) were all over (the news and otherwise) promoting the port Ambrose lng export conspiracy theory.

    • First I applaud the efforts undertaken by the bulletin. Unfortunately , in my opinion as a property owner and proponent of responsible gas mining that some key issues are under utilized. Many people who are strongly against fracking, including my late girl friend are extremely passionate about the land, water and animals of upstate N.Y. Other who are on the fence of this subject require the spoken of (responsible science) presented in such a eye opening way to influence their stance. The usual mud flinging between this bulletin and the NRDC, Cuomo and the rest in my opinion is not the most effective strategy to achieve a positive outcome in my life time!
      The responsible science need be effectively broadcasted to the supporters, opponents and those on the fence for natural gas development . Once this accomplished and it is totally undeniable that responsible gas development is a reality, then the legal issue similar to eminent domain, where as property owners would need to be paid by the state for the resources they are unfairly and perhaps unlawfully prohibited from extracting. Just my two cense on what I see unfolding.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *