Stockholm Syndrome: Westchester Folks Ask Cuomo for Help with ConEd

cost of renewables - Tom ShepstoneTom Shepstone
Natural Gas NOW


Westchester County leaders, in a perfect display of the Stockholm Syndrome, are asking Andrew Cuomo for help in dealing with a ConEd moratorium he caused.

The Stockholm Syndrome is what happens when hostages develop irrational psychological sympathies with their captors as survival strategy during captivity. This term came into use after four hostages taken during a 1973 bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden, defended their captors upon release.

We may have another instance of it in Westchester County, New York where ConEd, the local gas provider, has had to impose a moratorium on new gas connections as a direct consequence of Andrew Cuomo delaying pipeline approvals that would bring new gas to the region. Who are Westchester leaders looking to for help? None other than Andrew Cuomo!

The building in Stockholm, Sweden where the robbery that inspired the term “Stockholm Syndrome” took place.

The Stockholm Syndrome is no joke. It’s happened many times, perhaps the most famous instance being that of Patty Hearst. She was held in captivity by Symbionese Liberation Army captors who hauled her around the country from one hideout after another (including one in South Canaan, Pennsylvania and another in Youngsville, New York). She even helped the SLA rob banks and spent time in jail for it.

Now, we’re seeing the same sort of thing in New York State. Governor Andrew Cuomo has made it a centerpiece of what seems to be a future Presidential campaign to be greener than the Green Parrot. He is, for the record at least, opposed to any sort of natural gas development; fracking, natural gas fueled power plants or pipelines. He has tried to kill numerous pipelines, in fact, including the Constitution Pipeline, which would connect with the Iroquois Gas Pipeline and thereby deliver gas to New York City and environs, including Westchester County.

Cuomo has, in opposing this and other pipelines, made it point to pander to the NRDC gang, its Catskill Mountainkeeper subsidiary and anti-gas groups such as “Stop the Pipeline.” He has blatantly called for New York to get of gas, effectively holding new gas-related projects hostage as long as possible for the purpose of gaining green street cred, although it’s my opinion he has probably hoped all along FERC or the courts would overrule and give him gas after earning plaudits for opposing it. It’s a uniquely Cuomo style of crime.

It’s not worked out so well, though. FERC has been reluctant to take up the cudgel against him and the courts, although they’re getting there, have been excruciatingly slow in coming to the rescue, the Constitution Pipeline having lost several court cases to date, although it has good prospects at the DC Court of Appeals. These delays in throwing back the bones Cuomo through to the NRDC gang have now caused havoc. ConEd was forced to impose  a moratorium on new gas connections in Westchester County.

This has caused Westchester leaders to go bonkers and now they’ve gone full Stockholm Syndrome and are begging their captor for help as this article reveals (emphasis added):

Westchester government leaders and school superintendents are making a plea to Governor Cuomo to help find solutions to the moratorium on new gas service that Con Edison suddenly imposed on Westchester to go into affect on March 15. The moratorium affects both residential and commercial properties and would prevent developers of new construction and expansion of existing properties from access to gas service…

The leaders ask the Governor to expedite Public Service Commission approval of a proposal from Con Edison called “Smart Solutions for Natural Gas” and to create incentives for the use of clean energy sources. They also ask for the Governor to intervene in clearing the way for a new gas pipeline to bring more natural gas to Westchester. The complete letter is shown below.

We spoke to Assemblywoman Amy Paulin about the moratorium…

When we asked why more pipelines had not been built, Paulin said, “Con Ed says they were encouraged to create a smart solution for use of geothermal, heat pumps and other renewables rather than build a pipeline … and the Public Service Commission says Con Edison Assemblywoman Amy Paulin never came to them with a pipeline solution.

She continued, “There is no need to assess blame now. This is going to be our situation and we are going to have to make the best of it.” However if people decide to return to the use of oil and propane because there are not enough incentives for green solutions, they we have a problem.”

No need to assess blame? Really, Amy? When Andrew Cuomo’s PSC lies and says they’re unaware of pipeline solutions, you don’t know who to blame? And, you want us to believe the problem is a lack of green incentives when New York State electric rates already include outrageous direct and indirect subsidies to renewables? Give us a break! You know exactly what the problem is and its name is Andrew Cuomo, who has been selling out Westchester to appease the NRDC gang and its ilk.

The article also includes the full text of a letter signed by Amy and other Westchester leaders to their captor and it says it all if you read between the lines (with our help in red):

The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor of New York State
NYS State Capitol Building
Albany, NY 12224

Dear Governor Cuomo,

As representatives of the New Yorkers who live and work in Westchester County, we are writing to ask for your assistance, your leadership, and your outside-the-box creative thinking in dealing with the newly-announced temporary moratorium for new natural gas services in our area.

[Is there any more clear example of the Stockholm Syndrome at work than the above paragraph?]

As you know, on January 17, Con Edison formally announced to the Public Service Commission and to the general public that it would be instituting a temporary moratorium in most of its Westchester County service area for new natural gas services, including residential, commercial, or mixed-use buildings currently in development that will increase peak winter demand. The moratorium is scheduled to begin on March 15 – less than two months after it was announced – and would last for an indeterminate period of time. The only stated exceptions to the moratorium would be for new customers applying for interruptible service, gas service for emergency generators that only activate in the case of an electric outage, or other service patterns that would not be likely to impact gas delivery during peak winter usage.

We do not need to tell you that the news has sent a chill throughout the development community. Given the number of projects already advancing in our cities, towns, and villages, from major redevelopment in cities like New Rochelle, Rye, White Plains, and Yonkers, to the smaller residential, commercial, mixed-use, and school construction projects taking place throughout the county, we are deeply concerned about the potential economic headwinds coming from such a resource crunch. Those headwinds, on top of several other factors, could prove painful for our constituents and for the local economy. That could in turn have a ripple effect in terms of home prices and property values that further depress local economic development.

[You can read this as saying “You’re a contemptible idiot, Andrew, and you should have damned well known what would happen if you kept playing those stupid fracking games with our lives!”]

We were gratified to see the Public Service Commission take this issue so seriously and schedule public hearings in our region during the week of February 11. However, we believe that more creative and pro- active management is required to provide assurance that our region can effectively weather the major impact that this may have on our overall economy.

[You control the PSC. You tell them what to do. Now, tell them and your DEC to stop blocking pipelines!]

Specifically, we would appreciate the executive agencies of the state engaging in the following areas:

1.) Expedited Approval of “Smart Solutions” proposed by Con Edison

All of us support the state’s transition to sustainable, renewable, and green energy sources as critical to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, bending the dangerous trend lines of increased carbon emissions, and racing against the clock to fight the threats posed by climate change. Part of that effort has to include the successful promotion of clean energy alternatives that will have the added benefit of avoiding the negative impact natural gas moratorium on specific projects. We understand that Con Edison has submitted a number of proposals under the name “Smart Solutions for Natural Gas Customers.” These proposals for increasing the use of geothermal heating and air source heating pump solutions are pending review by the Public Service Commission. We urge that those proposals be placed on an expedited schedule so that they may be available to both new development and existing oil customers who are looking to convert to natural gas or some other method as soon as is practical.

[“We know you need cover and here it is. Now, do something dammit!”]

2.) Additional Incentives to Make Green Energy Solutions More Attractive
Both the “Smart Solutions” proposals submitted by Con Edison and the programs of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority create incentives to increase usage of clean energy sources. However, we understand that the cost differential between traditional natural gas and these new cleaner sources of energy is still too steep in many cases. We would urge the executive agencies to proactively and creatively establish new incentive programs to decrease this gap and make it more economically viable for new development and those converting from oil heat to choose smarter, cleaner, and greener options, and that Westchester County be given first priority for any pilot projects stemming from these efforts.

[“Throw so more of our money at this stupid green stuff if you have to, but get us the gas and do it now!”]

3.) Spearhead new, creative solutions to the question of natural gas transmission

Clearly the underlying conditions involve an increased demand for natural gas, and the constraints of the current infrastructure are insufficient to supply that demand. The main conveyance for natural gas is through interstate or intrastate pipelines, but we live in a challenging regulatory and political environment for the construction of new pipelines for fossil fuels. There are often many legitimate objections raised by local communities and environmental advocates. Although a traditional response to the basic economics of supply and demand would focus on the quick approval of a new pipeline, new construction can take four or five years from the beginning of the approval process by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and state agencies to the time when gas flows to the region, even when these objections from local communities and environmentalists can be accommodated. This raises the specter that the proposed moratorium could last for years before the underlying conditions improve.

[“You’ve created this problem, Andrew, with your pandering to the NRDC; now fix it and kiss those spoiled rich kids goodbye.”]

Over the years of your service as Governor, you have time and again shown a unique ability to overcome obstacles to the major, critical infrastructure projects that New York relies upon for its economic wellbeing. Your leadership has helped surmount obstacles including outdated regulatory requirements, a lack of creativity in the engineering of a project, or an overreliance on conventional thinking when it comes to risk and financing.

For the sake of our county’s economic well-being and the residents and communities that rely upon ongoing development projects put at risk by this sudden and potentially long-lasting natural gas moratorium, we ask you to provide that same leadership, ingenuity, and outside-the-box thinking to our current problem. We are prepared to do what we can to work with you in this effort.

[“We can’t tell you how much we love you and we apologize for the outbursts. They only reflect how much pain we feel for your situation and ours. Please save us!”]


Sandra R. Galef Member of the Assembly
Amy R. Paulin, Member of the Assembly
Steve Otis
 Member of the Assembly
Terry Clements
 Westchester County Legislator
Damon R. Maher
Westchester County Legislator
Josh Cohn
 Mayor, City of Rye
Thomas Roach
 Mayor, City of White Plains
Warren Lucas
 Supervisor, Town of North Salem
Michael Volpe
 Mayor, Village of Pelham
Dan Hochvert
 Mayor, Village of Scarsdale
Roy R. Montesano Ed.D., Superintendent Bronxville Union Free School District
Dr. Cheryl Champ, Superintendent Pelham Union Free School District
Eric Byrne, Ed.D, Superintendent of Schools Rye City School District
Pietro Fasolino, Board of Education President Rye Neck School District
Benjamin Boykin II
 Chairman, Westchester County Board of Legislators
Margaret Cunzio
 Westchester County Legislator
Noam Bramson
 Mayor, City of New Rochelle
Michael Spano
 Mayor, City of Yonkers
Nancy Seligson
 Supervisor, Town of Mamaroneck
Victoria Gearity
 Mayor, Village of Ossining
Gary Zuckerman Supervisor, Town of Rye
Jennifer Rosen, Board President Briarcliff Manor Board of Education
Dr. Walter Moran, Superintendent of Schools Eastchester Union Free School District
Carol Conklin-Spillane, Superintendent Pocantico Hills School District
Dr. Barbara Ferraro, Superintendent of Schools Rye Neck School District

cc: John B. Rhodes, Chair of the Public Service Commission and Chief Executive Officer, Department of Public Service

Alicia Barton, President and Chief Executive Officer, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority

The inner wrestling with emotions that’s going on with Westchester folks is obvious. They want their freedom but they’ve come to love their captor, Andrew Cuomo. It’s the Stockholm Syndrome at work.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

15 thoughts on “Stockholm Syndrome: Westchester Folks Ask Cuomo for Help with ConEd

  1. Does Andrew realize it would take 4000 square miles of solar panels just to run the NYC subway?

    Will he check with Vera for clear cutting central park?

    Will he ask Craig Stevens for a water filtration system?

    Stay tuned my friends cause this state is run by a whacked Governor who won’t execute cope killers but murders 56,000 babies a year. Won’t buy Pa Gas but imports it from Russia as he looks for Vladimir Putin’s millions for his presidential campaign


      Notice the antifracking or antifracking pipeline resistance groups and people invited to testify at this Senate hearing Todd kaminsky just had? Roger downs of the Sierra club, sape, the working families party, Catskill mountainkeeper etc? This isn’t cuomo’s doing right?

      Think one can get reporters to look into environmental groups that delude the public, which is something they should be doing? Believe me I have tried and one can’t. So it would seem that what’s corrupt in NY can not just be attributed to the governor.

      • Karen: This is what you’re looking for – It’s a report by the U.S. Senate Committee on the Environment Public Works titled: “The Chain of Environmental Command: How a Club of Billionaires and Their Foundations Control the Environmental Movement and Obama’s EPA.” While it is true that Obama is gone, these foundations are alive and well and stronger than ever. I plan on giving Cabot CEO George Stark hard copy of this 92 page document on March 29 when the next hearing convenes at the Montrose County Courthouse. Mr. Stark and all the rest of the fossil fuel companies must start putting great pressure on the feds to get going on investigating these billionaire foundations and all the “non – profit” groups that they subsidize. The groups play a money shell game between their 501(C)(3) and 501(C)(4) entities. As you may know, the C3 groups are severely restricted when it concerns lobbying, but the C4s have no such restriction. The Senate committee found out that these groups may be moving money between the c3 and c4s but apparently have not caught them doing it. The report summary questions what is the real end game with these foundations. They have far too much power and need to be reigned in.


      It is somewhat tiring to constantly read interpretations of reality which fall under the “Cuomo is the mastermind of everything ” category, particularly when it comes to both fracking and pipelines.

      So for example and it’s just one example Sandy Galef , a signer of this letter could be said to be supportive
      of the antifracking pipeline resistance movement , certainly
      it would seem she knows who sape is.

      It’s often the case that people falsely claim Cuomo was the puppetmaster pulling the strings sith the fracking issue when it actually appears like he was a weak politician bowing down to the bullying and pressure of the antifracking pipe!ine resistance movement. It’s important to also keep in mind that the former NYDEC commissioner as well as the current Dec commissioner, DEC staff involved with pipeline permits and fracking issue as well as the DOH commisioner all bear responsibility for their own actions regarding the fracking and
      pipeline permits in NY State.

      • Yes, probably much truth to what you say. Still, even if Cuomo is weak and easily influenced or bullied into these positions, he is supposed to be the leader, so the buck stops with him in NY state.

        • Im not sure how easily he was influenced. What was clear is that there was a sustained campaign for a ban on fracking in NY that targeted him for years, and what was also clear is that reporters promoted that movement and were unable or unwilling to report the truth, just as they are still now.

  2. If the NIMBY folks balk at having underground pipelines on or near their properties, they will go bonkers over the new solar farms, wind farms, molten sodium mega-battery storage arrays and new or up-sized big overhead electric poles, towers and lines that will be needed to bring in all of the additional electricity needed to power the electric heating systems, water heaters, cloths dryers and cookstoves formerly fueled by natural gas.
    As a protest, I am going to purchase an antique natural gas-powered refrigerator…

  3. Article X of the PSC allows for such transmission lines from “renewable facilities”.
    When and if they put them underground, can you imagine the disruption happening in their streets by their lofty overpriced and overtaxed suburban homes???

  4. At first, I agreed that it sounded like the Stockholm syndrome, but the more I read, it seems much more clever, almost Machiavellian. Gushingly praising the king for his wisdom and all the gifts he has bestowed upon his grateful serfs and then begging him to please please provide warm beds to the “poor” millionaires who want to live where there is no natural gas…alas…the horror…the humanity! This guy is in a box of his own making. What will the next chapter bring???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *