No Shale Gas Sustainability With Severance Tax

GordonTombGordon Tomb
Senior Fellow, Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives

A severance tax on natural gas development threatens to stall the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale miracle and stunt local economic growth. 

Armstrong County farmer Randy Walker worries about the effect of a natural gas severance tax on his royalties and the job market.

“A tax at the wellhead taxes my share and the company’s share,” says Mr. Walker. He adds, however, that he is most concerned about local jobs that could be lost if drilling is discouraged by a severance tax.

Mr. Walker’s concerns are well founded. The natural gas industry is facing marketplace challenges that would be exacerbated by a severance tax.

By the end of 2014, natural gas drilling in the Northeast — mainly Pennsylvania — will have added 13.4 billion cubic feet to daily gas production nationwide since 2008. Meanwhile, output in the rest of the U.S. has remained essentially flat, according to Bentek Energy, an energy market analytics company.

severance tax

Pennsylvania Well Pad – Photo Courtesy of Colin Diehl

This unprecedented growth in Pennsylvania is good news, but it creates its own set of problems.

Buried in reports that gas production from Marcellus shale is at an all-time high is the fact that the growth in new wells is slowing.

In 2012, the U.S. Energy Information Agency reported an industry estimate of “over 1,000 natural gas wells that have been drilled in northern Pennsylvania, but which are not yet producing natural gas because there is not enough interstate and gathering pipeline infrastructure to accommodate the new production.”

Today, we have significantly more gas available for extraction than pipelines to ship it to market — a fact that has spawned a number of projects for new pipelines. In the meantime, the shortage of pipelines drives up the cost of getting gas to consumers.

These delivery challenges are impacting drillers’ bottom lines. In July, Pittsburgh-based EQT Corp. reported the prices it could get for gas in the second quarter were 18 percent below a national benchmark.

Transportation costs are so high that “dry-gas wells” — wells without lucrative byproducts like butane and propane — are barely worth developing. Monthly starts for new dry-gas wells in Pennsylvania have fallen nearly 50 percent after peaking in 2011.

“While high quality core areas remain economically attractive, at least 70 percent of the Marcellus’s potentially producible dry gas is only marginally economic in today’s competitive market,” says petroleum geologist Gregory Wrightstone in Sewickley.

Many companies have either shut down or reduced drilling in dry-gas areas to focus on the more economic liquids-rich areas of the Marcellus, the Ohio Utica or shale plays farther west.

Even with the industry carrying the costs of current transportation constraints, some of the highest business taxes in the world and a natural gas impact fee, some special interest groups want drillers to pay even more through a severance tax that could undermine the viability of Pennsylvania’s gas industry.

Such a tax would affect more than drilling companies. “A new tax on gas would be extremely damaging to Pennsylvania’s economy and particularly to areas like Lycoming County and Williamsport,” said Vincent Matteo, president and CEO of the Williamsport/Lycoming Chamber of Commerce.

Mr. Matteo adds that while his area is doing well, there has recently been a slowdown in the regional economy. Taxing natural gas production would create a ripple effect, affecting employment opportunities in support industries as well as jobs in restaurants and retail.

Despite the remarkable performance of Pennsylvania’s gas producers, the natural gas industry remains subject to real-world economics. A severance tax would stunt drilling across the state to the detriment of communities like Lycoming County, landowners like Randy and natural gas consumers across the state.

Nothing in life is guaranteed, not even the Marcellus miracle. A severance tax will compromise the sustainability of the Marcellus Shale, along with our economic prosperity and energy security.

Check out what else is new at NaturalGasNow today!


While you’re at it, follow us on FacebookTwitter and Linked-In!


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 thoughts on “No Shale Gas Sustainability With Severance Tax

  1. There is nothing more pathetic than hearing someone boast about the remarkable performance of Pennsylvania’s gas producers and then complain about having to pay taxes.

    Pennsylvania is one of the few states that does not impose a severance tax. Ohio has a severance tax. Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming all have severance taxes. Why would a severance tax in Pennsylvania stunt drilling any more than elsewhere? Doesn’t the lack of such a tax mean that the difference must be made up by everyone else?

    Mr. Tomb and Mr. Walker need to realize that in the real world people pay taxes.

  2. Clifford, there is nothing worse than blind ignorance to the facts: the natural gas industry is doing a hell of a lot more than other industry in the state, especially when it comes to taxes!

    Just take a look at this picture that describes the differences between states that have severance and those that don’t:

    Why should should the natural gas industry have to shoulder the burden of years of poor fiscal decision making when it can pick up and move?

    You should be thankful you have the life you do because of natural gas & petroleum: energy, heat, medicine, plastics, transportation, even the computer you are using right now to write your comments.

    I’m proud to say I know people who work in the natural gas industry in PA!

  3. The operative word here, folks, is TAX. Somehow, somewhere, people are going to pay for this TAX. This is commonly known as basic economics. Only people can pay taxes… not corporations, which are merely collectors, not your dog, not some amorphous entity. Persons. This tax will be paid by a combination higher natural gas prices, directly by royalty owners, higher prices for products made with gas, higher electric rates and reduced valuation of energy companies. And as an added bonus, it will inhibit future production and reduce American competitiveness in a global economy.

    So while the tax-happy can point out to projections of increased revenues from a severance tax, they conveniently omit the lost revenues from reduced economic activity, fewer jobs and the like. It’s a classic ploy… emphasize the easily measurable tax income, ignore the less easily quantifiable harm.

    As noted many times, why single out a particular industry? Tax trees, cows, corn, rocks and maybe even lawyers. If you want to raise PA taxes to pay for the public employees’ underwater pension fund, just say so and raise the State’s flat income tax from 3.07% to whatever. Of course, the taxers will argue that a severance scheme will be paid largely by out-of-staters. How nice to stick it to other fellow citizens as well. Sadly, the tax-happy contingent can and will come up with any number of arguments as to why higher taxes are good for us all. The obvious fact is that it’s easy to pick on those big bad energy companies. I don’t hear anyone calling for a surtax on grandma’s survivor pension receipts.

    Lastly, just because other states impose severance taxes doesn’t make it a good idea. Repeat once more… T-A-X.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *