Natural Gas and Renewables Are Electric

Electric -  Tom Shepstone Reports Tom Shepstone
Shepstone Management Company, Inc.


The future of electric generation is in a combination of combined cycle natural gas generation and renewables, so why do so many enviros fail to see it?

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) is out with an updated Electric Power Monthly report illustrating just how electricity generation is changing in this country. It’s good news for all Americans as natural gas and renewables are, together, playing a huge role in the way new electricity is being produced.

Looking at the last decade it’s apparent they’ve grown together, which is not what a lot of renewables advocates want to see but it’s a fact. Moreover, if we want to continue to improve the environment we’ll do everything we can to generate more of both because the alternative is coal and it’s far from dead. The truth is that we need it all and that includes continuing improvements in energy efficiency, which have also contributed enormously.

There are several things that jump out when examines the EIA statistics. Here, for example, are two pie charts illustrating our electric generation in 2004 as compared to 2013:


Notice there is no significant change in nuclear or hydroelectric, but oil has basically disappeared from the scene as an electric generator and coal has taken a major hit, although it remains the largest generator by far. The two fuel sources that have grown in a major way, and grown together, have been natural gas (up from 18% to 27%) and renewables (up from 2% to 6%). Our associate Nick Grealy, from No Hot Air, has been making this point repeatedly, of course, but this latest EIA data demonstrates it yet again.

Don’t think coal is dead, however. The latest data, from 2013 on, which is still subject to revision, shows coal increased its share between 2012 and 2013 and continues to do so through the first six months of 2014, which is one of the reasons, undoubtedly, for our carbon emissions increasing slightly after several years of huge reductions thanks to natural gas conversions. We don’t go apoplectic over CO2 here at NaturalGasNow, but for those who do, this ought to mean something.

What matters far more to us is that we know how much cleaner the air is with conversions of electric power plants from coal to natural gas fuel. We documented this in the case of UGI’s Hunlock Creek Energy Center example where the PM <2.5 count went from 211.7 to 0.1 tons per year as output was tripled – literally a 99.95% reduction. Shifting back to coal threatens these extremely meaningful health improvements that we all ought to get behind if we’re serious about environmental progress.

We’re not Germany, however. We’re not building new lignite coal plants while using renewables to divert attention. The EIA data includes this interesting chart showing what type of new electric generating capacity is being added:


No new coal power plants have been built yet this year. Meanwhile, wind capacity has doubled, and both solar and natural gas combined cycle capacity numbers have soared. Natural gas combustion turbine systems are going by the wayside as the efficiency of the combined cycle systems takes over. Capacity numbers alone, though, are highly misleading as many renewable systems only generate electricity at about 25% of capacity. Other simple cycle plants, including natural gas powered plants, do little better, but combined cycle plants – the ones we’re building today – can achieve up to 60% according to this excellent summary. Here’s a video from the same source that illustrates how combined cycle plants operate in lay terms:

The efficiency of this system means natural gas offers far more electric generation than capacity numbers alone suggest and they’re much less expensive than almost anything else per unit of energy generated as this EIA analysis of levelized costs indicates. Only geothermal energy shows an advantage and that has limited application (and can involve fracking and methane migration issues). No other renewables come close to natural gas combined cycle plants in terms of costs or efficiencies.

Renewables on a soft scale, however, where they complement natural gas by reducing electric generation demands and allow the conversion of more coal plants to combined cycle gas plants make huge sense. The capacity number discussed above don’t account for smaller solar and wind facilities that can serve this function, particularly if they become competitive without subsidies. We can’t afford to subsidize all our energy and, therefore, there are limits on how far we can go with them, but when the subsidies end competition forces down costs, watch out. They’re not there yet but getting closer, which is a good thing.

When we can devise renewable systems that don’t require taxpayer subsidies they will be used by virtually every home and business and reduce electric demand to the point we can devote our natural gas to power plant electric generation, manufacturing, petrochemicals and the like, reducing our reliance on coal, nuclear and hydroelectric. All of these have issues, but need to be part of our energy mix for security purposes. Still, the future is in a combination of natural gas and renewables, which is already contributing to  a cleaner environment. They’re both electric.

Check out what else is new at NaturalGasNow today!


While you’re at it, follow us on FacebookTwitter and Linked-In!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

4 thoughts on “Natural Gas and Renewables Are Electric

  1. Pingback: Natural Gas and Renewables Are Electric | ShaleNOW

  2. sensible knowledge people would know this Tom and those types of people are generally not in the environmental movement. Policy makers in governments however see the course which you illustrate . Natural gas also goes beyond the electric generation business. Transportation of all types will be exploiting the NG benefits. When you see the Germans using unwanted renewable energy at off peak times to create Natural gas via electrolise as Audi is starting to do in their homeland then you realise the future.
    Included in Germany’s renewable tally is Biogas production which they have massive investment in. The unknowing environmental ziolots are like Vera . Waving a Plastic water bottle outside a courthouse pronouncing she wants clean water like the kind in her bottle. Yeah Natural Gas products that you rail against carry the very water you have in your hand vera

  3. Paul- It is possible for this information to reach environmentalists. I am disappointed in the level of discourse that I see in the “movement” myself and I am particularly disheartened in the places where I see almost complete misinformation and upside downing of reality. I am surprised to find myself so at odds with the “movement” and it is because I have personally seen how much people are untethered from reality, speaking completely fact free, that this has occurred. Seeing data, like the kind Tom has displayed here is helpful for me. It is what is needed and it probably needs repeating nearly constantly.

    I have spent nearly two years watching people upend reality in Brooklyn and Queens and I can tell you that though the people upending reality (and they are all antifracking activists or folks with other causes such as Occupy) constantly make the news, on the ground most people don’t buy their message one bit. More people have their feet on the ground than one would think from reading the news including often times environmentalists like myself.

  4. Feedstocks like invasive vegetation could be utilized to help supplement the production of biogas which is usually dependent upon seasonal supplies of spoiled food wastes and silage. At the same time, harvesting these pests for a beneficial purpose reduces if not eliminates the chance that they would eventually spread and reseed themselves since the biogas digesters destroy them. Also this negates the need to control them with herbicides will can have their own inherent problems. Most of these plants are found in disturbed areas like roadways and former farmlands. These locations could be put into productive use instead of just remaining fallow usually at the taxpayer’s expense. In their place, native species could be the established and given a “fighting chance” to overcome these invaders.
    Essentially it’s a win-win-win for the idustry, the tax/rate payer and the environment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *