Green Energy Being Abandoned As Economics Go Red

cost of renewables - Tom ShepstoneTom Shepstone
Natural Gas NOW

… 

Green energy quickly fades whenever the costs suddenly become readily apparent and no one wants to pay. China and Germany provide the latest evidence.

As the mush for brains and wolf-crying millennial Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez preaches the world is about to end in 12 years and the cost of green energy is, therefore, somehow irrelevant, two countries are saying otherwise. And, they’re not just any countries; they’re two of the nations cited by green energy advocates as world leaders we should all emulate with the greatest urgency. They are China and Germany. Both are stuck on coal as the U.S. has moved to cleaner gas that actually makes a difference.

Green Energy

If you listen to AOC long enough, 30 seconds or so, you realize she really has it in for her homeland. She supposes the U.S. is the cause of a global warming crisis and must spend whatever it takes to pursue a green energy revolution; her green new deal.” That attitude ignores reality. It is the U.S. that has “bent the curve downward,” on emissions as AOC-like politicians are prone to say. We have shifted from coal to gas to do so. China and Germany are sticking with coal because green energy can’t compete with it as gas does (although China is now fracking, too).

Here’s the story from China via our friends at the Institute for Energy Research:

China recently put the brakes on solar and wind energy, indicating that it will no longer approve wind and solar power projects unless they can compete with coal power prices. In late May 2018, China issued “2018 Solar PV Power Generation Notice,” imposing caps on solar energy and reducing feed-in tariffs on those projects. More recently, China’s National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration provided a series of conditions under which new solar and wind projects would be approved through the end of 2020. Conditions include that the price must match or undercut the national coal benchmark and that the projects must show that the grid can handle their output. In 2017, 12 percent of wind generation and 6 percent of solar generation was curtailed due to lack of transmission capacity…

China is cutting back on solar and wind units due to their cost, the ballooning subsidies the state owes the solar and wind power builders, and the lack of grid-connected transmission capacity. It has now placed the financial responsibility for the units on the local governments and required any solar or wind power built to be cheaper than the benchmark coal price.

And, here’s the latest from Germany via Platts:

Germany needs to retain half of its coal-fired power generation capacity until 2030 to offset the closure of all its nuclear reactors by 2021/22, economy and energy minister Peter Altmaier said Tuesday…

Altmaier said half of Germany’s current hard-coal and lignite capacity of just over 40 GW would still be operational in 2030, with any agreed phase-out timetable needing a periodic review based on security of supply and affordability criteria.

German power prices could be 8%-13% higher between 2022 and 2030 under an accelerated coal phase-out compared with a base scenario, analysts at broker Bernstein said Tuesday…

The minister virtually excluded additional coal closures in 2021 and 2022 as over 4 GW/year of nuclear capacity are set to close.

Altmaier warned of blackout risks under various scenarios, but praised grid operators in securing grid stability to date.

Germany, of course, put all its eggs into its Energiewende, which has spectacularly failed to reduce emissions as intended, but has spectacularly increased electric prices. The inability to phase down the use of lignite or dirty brown coal is directly attributable to ideological decisions to get out of clean nuclear energy and to never touch clean natural gas development. Compare this idiocy to the U.S., where the shale revolution has simultaneously lowered emissions and energy costs. But, don’t expect the girl wonder from the Bronx to get any of this. That would demand the ability to think rather than preen.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 thoughts on “Green Energy Being Abandoned As Economics Go Red

  1. Ocasio – Cortez is as ignorant and ill – informed as they come. But what would one expect from a 29 yr old former bartender from New York City with a bachelor’s degree from Boston College? I’ve sent emails to the Broome County legislature about the failure of Energiewende citing internet articles. They should heed the warning as they have already blown over $4,000,000 on the Broome Solar “farm” in Conklin. Only a fool would advocate for a power source that is as intermittent as solar and wind.

  2. No “green” energy is not being abandoned, nor is Ocasio-Cortez responsible for energy policy. More realistic observations and answers will show both opportunities and problems for gas supporters.

    The main reason renewables are not getting as much government help is that they generated so much power they are disrupting our antiquated electric grid.The more variable power you dump into the grid, the less stable the grid becomes. Even a modern micro grid will degrade with too much variable power. That is what China, Germany and even the American Plains states are experiencing.

    There are a few ways to make variable power “dispatchable” (available when it is needed). One is to use it to pump it water up a hill when surplus power is available and let it run down hill through a turbine when it is needed. Pump storage projects work well, but are few and far between. Another is to pump air into a cavern under high pressure and release it to generate power as needed.The last is battery storage, which is available on the consumer scale, but is expensive and has not yet scaled to utility size.

    https://www.energysage.com/solar/solar-energy-storage/tesla-powerwall-home-battery/

    Elon Musk famously delivered a 100 MWh set of batteries to Australia, but it was only used once so far for a few seconds.The key is the little “h”. Big battery or small, divide the rate you draining it into the total capacity and you have how long it will last. Do the math, if the anti’s will ever talk about what it will take to run even a small city; how big a battery, located where, at what cost and with how many wind turbines and square miles of solar panels will it take to run even a small city on a cold, winter night. Remember in the anti’s fantasy world, all appliances, heating, cooling, hot water, clothes dryers and all cars, trucks and trains will be electric.Good luck with electric passenger planes.

    Ocasio-Cortez is just a freshman in the House of Representatives. There are over 400 hundred others.How many, who need to be re-elected every two years, are going to meekly give her a minimum of a trillion dollars a year for the next 10+ years?

    We need to regain control of the energy narrative, not cater to our base so they can feel angry for a moment. Even as battery technology moves forward, we still have the best solution for the nation’s energy and environmental future. Let’s not waste the time we have on Ocasio-Cortez’s 15 minutes of fame.

  3. Pingback: Energy & Environmental Newsletter: February 11, 2019 - Master Resource

  4. Pingback: Energy And Environmental Newsletter – February 11th 2019 | PA Pundits - International

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *