FERC Issues Certificate for Northeast Supply Enhancement Pipeline

UDRBCTom Shepstone
Shepstone Management Company, Inc.


A four-member FERC issued a Certificate for the Northeast Supply Enhancement Pipeline this past week, which is a big step forward. The NESE is on its way!

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 3 to 1 to issue a certificate authorizing the construction and operation of “an expansion of Transco’s system in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and its offshore pipeline system in New Jersey and New York state waters (Northeast Supply Enhancement Project).” It is a big step forward for the project. It’s now up to the states to issue the necessary water quality certifications that will address those aspects of the project. Will New York and New Jersey do so? That remains to be seen, but they won’t find and support from FERC, even from the one Commissioner who voted no.

Northeast Supply Enhancement

Here is the FERC decision on the Northeast Supply Enhancement Project. And, here are some key excerpts (emphasis added):

15. We find that the proposed project will have no adverse effect on service to Transco’s existing customers because the proposed expansion facilities are designed to provide incremental service to meet the needs of the project shippers, without degrading service to Transco’s existing customers. We also find that there will be no adverse impact on other pipelines in the region or their captive customers, and no other pipelines or their captive customers have filed adverse comments regarding Transco’s proposal.

16. We find that Transco has sufficiently demonstrated that there is market demand for the project. Transco has entered into long-term precedent agreements for firm service with the project shippers for the full amount of additional firm transportation service to be made possible by the project. Moreover, Ordering Paragraph (B)(4) of this order requires that Transco file a written statement affirming that it has executed contracts for service at the levels provided for in their precedent agreements prior to commencing construction.

17. We are further satisfied that Transco has taken appropriate steps to minimize adverse impacts on landowners. As discussed in greater detail in the final EIS and, as appropriate, below, the onshore portion of Transco’s proposed project will disturb approximately 332 acres of land during construction, and approximately 60 acres of land during operation. Transco participated in the Commission’s pre-filing process and has actively worked with local stakeholders, including homeowners and landowners, as well as federal and state agencies to develop the proposed pipeline route, as well as evaluating 39 sites for the placement of Compressor Station 206. Transco proposes to co-locate approximately 97 percent of the Quarryville Loop within and alongside the existing Transco Mainline right-of-way, and 100 percent of the Madison Loop within and alongside the existing Transco Lower Bay Loop C right-of-way. Co-locating the pipelines will allow approximately 91 percent of the Quarryville Loop right-of-way to overlap with Transco’s existing right-of-way by at least 35 feet, and allow approximately 74 percent of Madison Loop right-of-way to overlap with Transco’s existing right-of-way by at least 20 feet.

18. Based on the benefits the project will provide and the minimal adverse impacts on existing shippers, other pipelines and their captive customers, and landowners and surrounding communities, we find, consistent with the Certificate Policy Statement and NGA section 7(c), that the public convenience and necessity requires approval of the project, subject to the environmental and other conditions in this order.

That pretty clearly dispenses with the factors FERC was created to consider. Demand, moreover, is obvious with gas distribution companies in the greater New York City area already forced to impose moratoriums on new connections.

But what about the environmental impacts? We’ve heard one ludicrous horror story after another from the Sane Energy wackos and other paid agents of the City’s gentry class about how the Northeast Supply Enhancement Project will destroy life as we know it. Well, FERC addresses those as well:

The final EIS concludes that construction and operation of the project will result in some adverse environmental impacts, but impacts will be reduced to less-than-significant levels with the implementation of Transco’s proposed, and Commission staff’s recommended mitigation measures, which are included as conditions to this order, as discussed below…

In filings submitted on February 27 and April 24, 2019, Transco states that the project would enable National Grid to convert approximately 8,000 customers a year from heating oil to natural gas, displacing up to 900,000 barrels of oil per year.

Transco also indicates that its project would more than offset net GHG emissions under a hypothetical scenario in which the entire capacity of the project would displace existing or new fuel oil use in New York…

We have reviewed the information and analysis contained in the final EIS regarding potential environmental effects of the project, as well as other information in the record. We agree with the conclusions presented in the final EIS and find that the project, if constructed and operated as described in the final EIS, is an environmentally acceptable action. Further, for the reasons discussed throughout the order, as stated above, we find that Transco’s Northeast Supply Enhancement Project is in the public convenience and necessity. Compliance with the environmental conditions appended to our orders is integral to ensuring that the environmental impacts of approved projects are consistent with those anticipated by our environmental analyses.

FERC, in fact, methodically and compellingly dispenses with every wacko environmental point of opposition. All four commissioners did so. The no vote on the Commission came from climate change fanatic Ted Glick. Commissioner Cheryl A. LaFleur also expressed somer climate concerns but came down on the side of the NESE in the end, implying the impact simply wasn’t that significant in the big picture and that the NESE was obviously mitigating those impacts itself, which is obvious to anyone with half a brain. She probably wanted to vote with Glick as an exercise in political correctness but, given there are only four FERC members now, public responsibility demanded otherwise. Good for her.

What must not ignored here, though, is that all four FERC commissioners rejected the falsehoods and the hysteria from the usual suspects. Good for all of them. They also made it clear the states have to act within the framework FERC has established:

Any state or local permits issued with respect to the jurisdictional facilities authorized herein must be consistent with the conditions of this certificate. The Commission encourages cooperation between interstate pipelines and local authorities. However, this does not mean that state and local agencies, through application of state or local laws, may prohibit or unreasonably delay the construction or operation of facilities approved by this Commission.

Yes! The Northeast Supply Enhancement Project is on its way. The only question is whether there will be delays fighting political denials of water quality certifications by New York and New Jersey. The pressure is now on them.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *