Powered by Max Banner Ads 

What Will the Trump Effect Be on Energy?

Constitution Pipeline - MarkindDaniel B. Markind, Esq.
Weir and Partners, LLP

 

The Trump win and widespread Republican gains down ballot suggest many possible changes in the US energy scene even as radicals snipe away in irrelevancy.

By a narrow margin, Measure Z was approved by residents of Monterey County, California.  The ballot initiative, which would ban fracking in Monterey (where it does not currently happen anyway), also bans new oil wells, injection wells and wastewater ponds.  Surprisingly, as Monterey went so didn’t the United States.  Republicans celebrated victories up and down the ballot, and cities like Youngstown, Ohio for the fifth time rejected a “Community Bill of Rights” aimed at reducing, if not banning hydraulic fracturing.   For better or worse, jobs took clear precedence over claims about the ecology.

Trump imrs-2

Perhaps in reaction to the election returns, federal agencies have been busy placing new hurdles in the way of oil and gas development and transportation.  The Bureau of Land Management came out with new rules on methane requiring companies working on federal or tribal lands to reduce leakage.  In addition, the Army Corps of Engineers announced a delay in the construction of the final piece of the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.  It seems clear the President is moving swiftly to try to preserve his “green” legacy as much as possible, with the knowledge that much of what his Administration is doing in its final days quickly can be undone by the incoming Trump Administration.

Unfortunately for the current Administration and its supporters, the election was not their only bad news the last two weeks.  In Pennsylvania, Judge Kevin Brobson issued a preliminary injunction blocking the State from enforcing provisions in its Chapter 78a Oil and Gas Regulations pertaining to public resources, well permit reviews, wastewater impoundment and site restoration.  He refused to grant one for regulations pertaining to onsite processing, spill remediation and waste reporting, which now go into effect. 

Perhaps most decisively, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality issued its final report on the Pavillion water contamination, rejecting earlier claims by the EPA that fracking was responsible for the contamination of water-supply wells east of the town.  “Evidence does not indicate that hydraulic fracturing fluids have risen to shallow depths utilized by water-supply wells.”  In addition, “upward natural gas seepage…was happening naturally before gas well development.” 

Along with Parker, Texas and Dimock, Pennsylvania, the Pavillion story once again puts the EPA in the cross-hairs of those who believed that the federal agencies were abusing their power under President Obama.  They will press President Trump to pull back on federal involvement.   If the EPA had any real successes to point to in this field, it would have a far better argument for continued involvement, but to this point it has little to show.  Those continued failures will make it very easy for President Trump to pull federal involvement way back and return authority over the process to the States. 

The new President will take office with sweeping new finds being reported.  The Midland Basin of the Wolfcamp Shale area in the Permian Basin in Texas is estimated to contain 20 billion barrels of oil and 1.6 billion barrels of natural gas liquids.  Meanwhile in Colorado, as previously reported, the Mancos Shale could hold 40 times more technically recoverable natural gas reserves than previously estimated.  As much of this is on federal land, the adequacy and efficacy of federal land management will be front and center come January.

Trump 2016-mancos-assessment-map

So what does a stunning and sweeping Republican victory mean for the energy industry moving forward?  First, it seems likely that the pipeline buildout will move quicker, without federal interference.  Opponents will continue to use the courts and state laws to try to block construction, but anticipate FERC and other federal agencies (like the Army Corps) to act more vigorously in opposition to continued delay. 

Second, expect the Department of Energy to be more forthcoming on export permit applications, and on terminal permit construction applications.  This is simply low hanging fruit that will win wide support from nearly all communities except those vigorously opposed to fossil fuels. 

Third, huge government subsidies for renewal energy likely will lessen, although I doubt they will dry up completely. 

Finally, the Trump Administration will use energy as leverage in foreign affairs, something the Obama Administration not only refused to do but actively sought to limit its ability ever to do.

One of the most interesting early skirmishes likely will be between Trump and New York Governor Cuomo over the Clean Streams Permit needed to complete the Constitution Pipeline.   Not only does this issue deal with energy policy, it has elements of federalism and State’s rights intertwined within. 

While the industry has done a poor job of explaining the nation’s vulnerability to some of the world’s worst actors if the infrastructure buildout does not take place, having a government of like mind and not one bent on minimizing the international and political risk is bound to help the industry’s cause.

cuomo trump

Governor Cuomo also now has a very interesting decision to make.  Does he look for a peaceful way out or does he double down, solidifying his green credentials while possibly becoming the poster child for why the Democrats lost an election they seemed sure to sweep?

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

7 thoughts on “What Will the Trump Effect Be on Energy?

  1. Cuomo is now talking of doubling down as I have heard he wishes to run for President for the Democrats in 2020. Gee Governor you think shouting down from the ivory towers of Albany and Manhattan is going to change anything ? If this election was a referendum on fracking in all the US counties with the practice Hillary Clinton and Jill Stein lost badly. Some counties Fracing Banner Dr Jill Stein garnered as few as 14 votes.

    • Sorry, it’s The TriumP that has the Manhattan ivory tower.

      Yeah, I know it’s gilded in gold, but who cares about the truth these days?

    • And Cuomo doesn’t have a chance in 2020, or 2024, for the same reason that he didn’t have a chance in 2016: he’s got the sex appeal of a dried prune. And intellectually, he’s no Mario.

  2. What are you still doing in the US udogma aka lionel aka Michael Lebron? Arrogant hypocrite celebrities all said they’d move to Canada. What a bunch of whining posers… you just got your asses handed to you by the rural working class, yet the New York Times on down and paid radical activists are fomenting open rebellion against the election results.

    Cuomo, sadist that he is, will be wearing orange someday but the wheels of justice grind far too slowly for the pain he has inflicted on upstate.

  3. Parts of this sound downright delusional to me.

    A. Measure z was a clear win for antifracking movement. I assume this isn’t natural gas but comparing this then to Republicans winning in other regions doesn’t matter . Choosing Trump for example did not mean choosing fracking. Nor natural gas.

    B. In order for Trump to effect natural gas pipelines he would have to do what exactly? Ferc has been slowing pipeline approvals under president Obama?

    C. The polls on fracking are what at this point?

  4. Please see the following post

    Goodwin, R.W. “We Have a New President: How Will it Affect Energy and Environmental Issues?” Natural Gas Now; November 10, 2016

    Energy and environmental issues have long been solved according to political correctness instead of by experts; with our new President that may change.

    Posted on November 10, 2016 by Natural Gas Now Guest Blogger

    http://naturalgasnow.org/new-president-affect-energy-and-environmental-issues/

  5. I don’t recommend investing in solar or wind energy right now.

    “Stocks of wind and solar companies plunged in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s victory in the November election. What does that tell us about the viability of these companies absent government support? It tells me how dependent wind and solar power companies are on continued government largesse. Despite decades of government subsidies, mandates, and support, electricity generated by wind and solar power companies is still more expensive than that produced by conventional fuels like coal, nuclear, hydro, and natural gas.”

    http://blog.heartland.org/2016/11/trump-wins-wind-and-solar-stocks-enter-freefall/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads