Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Want Cleaner Air? Try Natural Gas.

shale gas outrages - Tom Shepstone ReportsTom Shepstone
Shepstone Management Company, Inc.

 

UGI’s Hunlock Creek Station provides the perfect example of what natural gas can do for air quality by dramatically lowering emissions – delivering cleaner air.

Some people are serious about the environment and others are just looking for a cause or an excuse to promote their favorite political ideology. The latter is typified by an article that appeared in Philly.com early last year about  a protest of a coal to gas power plant conversion in New Jersey. The protest was organized by the Sierra Club of New Jersey and the sheer idiocy of what they were up to may be discovered in the first two paragraphs:

UPPER TOWNSHIP, N.J. A group of environmental advocates marked Earth Day on Tuesday by demonstrating against a plan to convert the B.L. England coal-fired electrical generation plant to gas, saying a new plant was unneeded and would be a new source of pollution.

Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, called the site “ground zero” and “the most important location in New Jersey when it comes to protecting the future of the environment.”

The idea that the conversion of a coal plant to natural gas represents anything but a major reduction in pollution suggest Tittel needs remedial math, and a lot of it, because barely a month earlier we reported here on what’s happened with the conversion of a Pennsylvania coal plant to natural gas and the results were astounding.

Jeff Tittel, of course, isn’t at all interested in any kind of math. He’s an ideologue who boldly goes where no reasonable person would dare, driven by a utopian dream and a wad of money from elitist special interests who see opportunities to profit off those utopian schemes or who are, perhaps, Lex Luther caricatures simply determined to remake the world. The rest of us have to live in the real world.

Cleaner Air

Jeff Tittel – Sierra Club of NJ

Tittel, nonetheless, continues to get news coverage, working hand in hand with the Delaware Riverkeeper, the Clean Air Council and other special interest shills in fighting anything remotely connected to delivering the energy they use every day. He, like the others, prefers instead to espouse a religious-like belief in a renewables future that doesn’t come close to addressing real energy needs or making a meaningful difference in environmental quality.

Perhaps an update from the Realville, as our guest blogger Dick Downey calls it, is needed. Somehow, I doubt any amount of data would ever convince a guy like Tittel of anything, but others may be interested in just what a coal to gas conversion means in terms of air pollution.

Fortunately, we have the data and it’s nothing less than stunning. All that’s needed to explore it is this link to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) facility emissions database. From this, it’s incredibly easy to chart what’s really making a difference in delivering cleaner air, and it’s not the Sierra Club or its silly protests that so captivate some in the media. The charts tell the story, comparing emissions from the year 2000 when UGI’s Hunlock Creek Energy Center in Luzerne County was a 44-megawatt coal fired plant to 2013 after upgrade to a combined cycle natural gas powered plant with more than twice the capacity.

Let’s start with Carbon Monoxide:

Cleaner Air

Carbon Monoxide emissions have decreased by two-thirds through conversion to natural gas. That’s cleaner air, but it’s just the beginning of the good news. Here is the story on Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs):

Cleaner Air

Again, there is a major reduction. And, here’s Particulate Matter under 10 microns:

Screen Shot 2015-10-14 at 12.26.17 PM

Now, look at what’s happened with Nitrogen Oxides:

Cleaner Air

And, here’s Sulfur Oxides, the biggest improvement of all:

Cleaner Air

Finally, let’s look at Carbon Dioxide (CO2), that big bugaboo for folks worried about global warming. We don’t have historical data on this one for Hunlock Creek, but we do have 2013 data for both it and a nearby comparably sized coal fired plant at Panther Creek in adjoining Carbon County (note the irony) and see the difference:

Cleaner Air

What all these charts demonstrate is the absurd logic or, more accurately, the irrationality and lack of any logic on the part of fractivists such as Jeff Tittel, who want everyone to focus on the 2 tons per year of Sulfur Oxides a gas plant produces, rather than the 3,200 tons a conversion to gas eliminated in the case of Hunlock Creek. They want to pull our eyes away from the 99.94% cleaner air delivered toward the 0.06% remaining. But, the latter means nothing in the absence of the former and calling what’s left “pollution” is a rhetorical  twist of reality with the singular purpose of selling an ideological position that has nothing whatsoever to do with cleaner air, but, rather, politics of the most devious, yet crude, sort.

A lie, in other words. The truth is this; if you want cleaner air, then natural gas is the way to get it.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

9 thoughts on “Want Cleaner Air? Try Natural Gas.

  1. Next up after Tittel, who seems incapable of ever uttering something even remotely true or sane when it comes to natural gas, fracking or pipelines, ( follow link if you would like to him still spouting export conspiracy theory on port ambrose 3 years after application submittal and after final environmental impact statement was released– http://www.app.com/story/news/local/land-environment/2015/10/13/port-ambrose-christie-cuomo/73868190/)…. Kathleen Nolan of Catskill Mountainkeeper. Looks like Kathleen Nolan needs takes a refresher on air pollution from Gina MCarthy !!

    http://www.catskillmountainkeeper.org/kathleen-nolan-catskill-mountainkeeper-high-peaks-regional-director/

    Inquiring minds want to know is this the very same Kathleen Nolan of Concerned Health Professionals of New York and Physicians for Social Responsibility featured in this piece of PR by ecowatch?

    http://ecowatch.com/2015/10/14/health-risks-fracking/

    Fascinating stuff– the interconnected upside down no-nothing world of this antifracking movement. How many forums are these folks holding where they pretend to be educating people?

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-14/gas-pipeline-foes-got-a-lesson-in-protest-tactics-from-keystone

    OMG! The pipelines are coming! The pipelines are coming!

    The “reporters” are now discovering the great fracking pipeline wars years into the conflict it seems. How timely.

  2. This is exactly the type of information our side needs to make better use of. Most people do not know how much cleaner natural gas is than other fuels or how long it will take renewables to be cost effective against it. Every reader of this site should be ready to share it and the efficiencies of Combined Cycle power plants in the related article by Jim Willis.

  3. Jeff Tittel – Sierra Club of NJ

    Tittel would make a good poster child for the rhinestone, hi-rise, city dwelling, so called environmentalists, in the New York City metropolitan area. He actually thinks that he’s breathing good clean New York City air. He and his frightfully confused cohorts also view Manhattan as a wonderful and clean environment. Tittle, along with all of his cohorts are all chronic closet natural gas users. They are all heavily invested in their pie in the sky renewable scheme that they lost their asses in previously. Hence, all other proven, abundant, viable and sensible clean burning fuels must be discredited immediately, and only their proven unworkable and already discredited folly is to be considered, period! Their frightfully flawed solar panel system did not work previously, and it doesn’t work now. It’s time to get over it and stop the misleading and false virtues of what is a already a proven and failed system. Clean and abundant natural gas is here now, and it is hear to stay as the number one fuel for a long, long time to come.

  4. Pingback: PennLive Shale Series Shows Why Media No Longer Trusted

  5. Pingback: A Warning for Scotland: Push Forward on Natural GasNatural Gas Now

  6. Pingback: Wolf Postures and Wastes Time While DEP Permits LanguishNatural Gas Now

  7. Pingback: Northeast Air Quality Rises to New Highs with Natural Gas UseNatural Gas Now

  8. Pingback: The Real Climate Change Deniers Are the FractivistsNatural Gas Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads