Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Unfortunately, All Pipeline Politics Are Anything But Local

keep-it-in-the-ground

Keep It Grounded In Fact
(American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers)

  

Pipeline politics, like fractivism, is a movement of outsiders, out-of-staters and well-funded special interests having little to do with local issues.

Six people were arrested last month in Lancaster, Pennsylvania for blocking construction of the Atlantic Sunrise pipeline, four were residents of New York and another was from Philadelphia. Only one of the protesters was “a local.” This locals-to-carpetbaggers ratio is typical of the pipeline protests across the country. Very often, the overwhelming majority of those arrested for illegally protesting pipeline construction don’t live anywhere near the pipelines.

Pipeline Politics

Emma Yip

More than 94% of the nearly 600 activists arrested at the Dakota Access pipeline last year (many for instigating violent clashes with police), were from out of state. And, nearly a third of them had prior criminal records.

But, rather than be embarrassed by their role as out-of-state instigators meddling in other people’s business, these professional activists actually brag about it.

Emma Yip, a California activist who testified at a permit hearing for the Bayou Bridge pipeline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana last January, boasted she was instrumental in costing North Dakota taxpayers millions of dollars by recruiting hundreds of out-of-state activists to disrupt the Dakota Access pipeline. She then threatened to do the same to the taxpayers of Louisiana.

Active involvement from people from across the world have [sic] cost the state of North Dakota 22.3 million taxpayer dollars. And that is in a place that has blizzards. I image we could easily rack you up twice that in this comparable paradise, if you so choose … We are connected with people across the country—heck across the world—who won’t blink from your tear gas, duck from your rubber bullets, or cringe from your sound cannons.

The most troubling anti-pipeline carpetbaggers, however, aren’t just out-of-staters; they’re Russians. As we reported back in February:

A recently released U.S. intelligence report on Russia’s efforts to influence the presidential election cited clear evidence that the Kremlin is financing and choreographing anti-fracking propaganda in the United States … The Russian government is concerned about the impact of fracking and U.S. natural gas production on the global energy market, and they are going to great lengths to disrupt our nation’s natural gas production.

The Russian involvement is so significant that Reps. Lamar Smith (R-TX), chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, and Randy Weber (R-TX), chairman of the Energy Subcommittee, wrote to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin last summer asking him to “conduct a full and complete investigation into the allegations” that Russia was working with American activists to hobble pipeline construction and natural gas production.

And just last week, Buzzfeed reported that an Instagram account called @Native_Americans_United—which rallied its 33,000 followers against the Dakota Access pipeline—was “connected to a Russian troll farm intent on exploiting existing divisions and social movements in the United States.”

Pipeline Politics

Russia’s involvement in anti-pipeline protests has been suspected for quite some time. In a June 2014 speech, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, “We were even up against phony environmental groups, and I’m a big environmentalist, but these were funded by the Russians to stand up against any effort, ‘Oh that pipeline, that fracking, that whatever will be a problem for you,’ and a lot of that money supporting that effort was coming from Russia.”

It is said that all politics is local, but when it comes to pipelines, that is clearly not the case. This should be a concern to all Americans because the last thing we need are Russian agents working with out-of-state activists to cripple our vital energy infrastructure.

Editor’s Note: Emma Yip, on her LinkedIn page, describes herself as follows:

I graduated from UC Berkeley in 2016. With a BS in Society and Environment, my research interests were focused on the political ecology of land and control grabs. I now direct a social justice project geared towards raising environmental awareness within the deep south.

Need we say more? Not really, but her web page is a perfect illustration of the utter immaturity and shallowness of so much of fractivism and pipeline politics. Check it out.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

2 thoughts on “Unfortunately, All Pipeline Politics Are Anything But Local

  1. Of course the Russians used social media to influence the election and fracking opposition. Doesn’t “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” and Lenin’s quote “capitalists will sell you the rope you will hang them with” explain their motivation and method? The Russians have huge reserves of gas in in Siberia and needed the fracking technology and time to build more pipelines to Asia and Europe.

    If only there was a way to get the technology and delay the Americans from disrupting the world market. Obama and Clinton implemented the sanctions that kept Rex Tillerson (Russian Medal of Friendship recipient) from selling them the tech, so the enemy Clinton’s presidential ambitions must be frustrated with some one much friendlier. The rest is becoming history.

    Luckily Rep. Lamar Smith was on the job and demanded an investigation back in June and although Secretary Mnuchin isn’t conducting one, I’m sure Rep. Smith is glad someone is.

  2. Sanctions? Maybe the ROI wasn’t good enough or could easily be rolled into her “foundation”? Besides, even with vast reserves you mentioned, Vlad and co. would still have to invest precious resources to make gas extraction profitable anyway. So by steering a portion of the USA’s uranium for even “civillian” energy production (via questionable USSR era nuke plants) was a better deal for Vlads and Hillary’s personal “slush funds”. Yep, Barry, Hillary and the rest of their ilk were really looking out for the benefit of the world…NOT!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads