Powered by Max Banner Ads 

It’s Sunset for the Lancaster Stand Against the Atlantic Sunrise

cost of renewables - Tom ShepstoneTom Shepstone
Natural Gas NOW

… 

Turnabout being fair play, it’s a beautiful thing; Williams, developer of the Atlantic Sunrise pipeline is sunsetting the Lancaster Against Pipelines Stand.

“The Stand” had been sunsetted. According to the Houston Chronicle:

CONESTOGA, Pa. (AP) — A company building a $3 billion pipeline to carry natural gas is purchasing a southeastern Pennsylvania farm that has served as a base of operations for pipeline opponents.

Atlantic Sunrise pipeline builder Williams said Monday it has struck a deal with the owner of the 107-acre property near Conestoga, in Lancaster County. The purchase price wasn’t disclosed.

The property owners had allowed environmental activists to use a portion of the farm as a protest encampment. The site attracted anti-pipeline activists from around the country, including members of an American Indian tribe that tried to stop the Dakota Access pipeline in North Dakota.

Williams will use the property to drill under the Conestoga River.

The group Lancaster Against Pipelines says the sale is a “stark example of how much pressure” Williams exerts on private landowners.

The Lancaster Against Pipelines website makes no mention of the news as of 6:00 AM this morning. The group’s Facebook page acknowledges it, though, and includes a pathetic statement that it would “continue to stand with the community.” Lancaster Online covers it all here.

Atlantic Sunrise

The reality, of course, is that the community has tired of Lancaster Against Pipelines. It’s no more than another relatively small group of malcontents, who have convinced themselves they, and they alone, are entitled to speak for the community.

What is particularly interesting is that Williams rose to the challenge of owners of the property where The Stand was erected:

Williams said in a statement to LNP that it was buying the Justin and Susan Cappiello farm on Conestoga Boulevard to allow for a large staging area so that it can drill under the Conestoga River…

“By reaching a mutually beneficial sales agreement with the property owner, Williams can ensure that the location of its planned horizontal directional drill is kept secure and that Williams employees, contractors and protesters remain safe during the extensive HDD mobilization and construction process.”

Stockton [Williams spokesman] said the property’s use as a farm would continue and that an Amish tenant farmer would be allowed to remain

The Cappiellos had refused to sell Williams an easement for the pipeline and had been vocal opponents of the pipeline. They allowed opponents to use the farm as a base for opposition.

In a June interview with LNP, Susan Cappiello said the couple had hoped to build a dream home on it and that bisecting the farm would ruin it. She said at the time she and her husband had insisted Williams buy the entire farm if they wanted any part of it.

The Stand, a building to serve as a symbol of opposition, was erected in the pipeline right of way. Members of Lancaster Against Pipelines planned to dismantle it by Tuesday when the land would be transferred to Williams…

Williams for more than a year had sought easements on the Cappiello property for the pipeline and for drilling under the river. Specifically, Williams had gone to court seeking to condemn the property for a permanent easement of 3.5 acres, for a temporary easement of 5.9 acres and a temporary access easement for .35 of an acre.

Williams did the smart thing here. It tested the resolve of “vocal opponents” who claimed the Atlantic Sunrise pipeline would ruin their property (it will not as proven by the continuing farm use) and found it was all about the money. And, if Williams did pay $3 million (the reported asking price) for 107 acres with river frontage, the company got a fair deal as well, given the importance of the site and the value of such acreage in Lancaster County.

So ends The Stand. It has sunsetted. The malcontents will continue, of course, to do what malcontents do, but the focal point is gone. One wonders, in fact, if they didn’t know it was coming; explaining the sudden refocus on the property of the nuns who brag about their own natural gas use while set-righteously opposing anybody else doing so. If so, they have moved from one hypocritical stand to another.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

6 thoughts on “It’s Sunset for the Lancaster Stand Against the Atlantic Sunrise

  1. “The group Lancaster Against Pipelines says the sale is a “stark example of how much pressure” Williams exerts on private landowners.” is certainly an interesting statement isn’t it? What’s the pressure? A big stack of money?

    I was curious about how much the property was sold for myself.

    Well I guess it will be interesting to see if some kind of resistance camp other than the stand arises. By the way the media is COMPLETELY WRONG that the idea of a camp of resistance to a pipeline project originated with the dakota pipeline last year. As it is a fact that one was called for years ago (almost three now actually) in NYC over the rockaway pipeline.

    http://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/2014/09/09/peoples-climate-action-camp-against-the-rockaway-pipeline/

    • The protests have been going on for more than 3 years. People just hop from one “local” protest to the next. Living off money donated by well meaning (but gullible) people trying to help the poor oppressed local people. Meanwhile, the people that actually live there every day are ignored.

  2. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-01/north-dakota-still-seeking-to-recoup-pipeline-protest-costs

    Well with any luck I guess pennsylvania tax payers or american tax payers won’t be picking up the bill for some chaos over “the stand”. What was the total cost with dakota pipe one wonders and remember one should factor in the costs that are financial but social. Anger, conflict etc as well as what was certainly an astonishing failure by “media” in a time that is already being refereed to as “post truth”.

    The reality is that antifracking pipeline resistors cannot be convinced not to mislead the press, legislators, governing bodies etc. Believe me. I have tried. For a long time. Anti-fracking pipeline resistance orgs and activists cannot continue to be used by the press for background material, and to explain how pipelines are permitted or what controversies over them are. They simply lie too much for that. Unfortunately it does not seem to me that reporters and editors care that they are using bad sources and getting facts and story wrong and that is extremely troubling.

  3. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/pad7zz/what-anti-pipeline-warriors-have-learned-from-standing-rock

    Well this is Vice. And it is a fantastic article about what anti-pipeline warriors have learned from standing rock. What’s clear is that Vice hasn’t learned how to report on pipelines (or fracking) as their work has been absolute junk now for years.

    Of course Vice isn’t alone and people somehow think this crisis in the reporting field when it comes to pipelines, fracking and covering the antifracking pipeline resistance movement is business as usual? Like this is just how it is and will continue to be? That is madness.

  4. I’d bet that if the nuns were offered a big stack of money for their farm they’d take it too. It’s about the money and not the environment with most of those who oppose.

    • Better watch out or people will be setting themselves on fire or something worse in their martyrdom. I could see the nuns choosing to do time. The movement reveres Tim DeChristopher who did some and James Crowley is in the news currently for choosing to spend some time in jail I think instead of pay a fine for his agitprop protest stunt again CPV natural gas power plant in NY. Remember when Sandra Steingraber did this? I think this was over the Seneca lake proposal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads