Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Sunlight Needed on Solar Scams and Green Banks

Green Bank - Tom ShepstoneTom Shepstone
Natural Gas NOW

 

Solar energy has its place, but New York’s solar scams and green bank corporatist boondoggle are setting the stage for a gigantic fall – time for sunlight.

New York is corrupt – that much is certain. Still, there is something especially rotten about what’s happening with the NY Green Bank and the state’s ongoing solar and other energy scams. We also wrote about these problems here, here and here, but the plot keeps thickening. We’re learning more, and seeing more, of what is a corporatist boondoggle bound to fail, while the opportunity to pursue a proven energy solution is sidelined due to green political correctness. Only in New York!

NYGB green bank

New York has been on a tear recently promoting solar energy and various activities of the NY Green Bank. Among the activities happening are the following:

  • Groups such as Sustainable Otsego are attempting to leverage New York State’s solar slush funds to develop an alternative to natural gas drilling. They are suggesting “landowners can now lease their land for solar or wind farms.” They are attempting to recruit participants by indicating they have assembled a: “group of municipalities and schools that are looking to put up a series of individual solar farms adjacent to one another… Each municipality/school would have panels and a meter (with remote net metering capability) built and operated under a power purchase agreement. The municipality/school, pays nothing up front but agrees to buy power from its portion at an agreed rate, for an agreed period of time. Everyone benefits from the economies of scale. And, a landowner gets to lease out land for income. No chance of toxic materials poisoning wells; better for the atmosphere; long term energy supplier to be used locally. The landowner could even cover his own energy needs in the process.”
  • The Binghamton Regional Sustainability Coalition (BRSC) announced it was “awarded a grant of $1.8 million from the State of New York to participate in a collaborative project to increase energy conservation and solar penetration in the Southern Tier and Mid-Hudson regions.”  it says “Our lead partners in this project are Catskill Mountainkeeper, Sustainable Hudson Valley, and Cornell Cooperative Extension of Tompkins County (CCET), each of which brings extensive experience in conservation, renewable energy promotion and sustainable community development.  The funding will come from Phase II of the Cleaner, Greener Communities (CGC) Program, within the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), and is being awarded through Round IV of Governor Cuomo’s Regional Economic Development Council (REDC) initiative.”
  • Andrew Cuomo announced “the first transactions of NY Green Bank to kick off clean energy projects across New York. These initial transactions, supported and agreed to in principle, will ultimately produce investments totaling more than $800 million. The projects, which are traditionally difficult for the private sector to finance, were made possible by NY Green Bank’s participation and are expected to result in an annual reduction of 575,000 tons of carbon dioxide.”

Does any of this make sense? Well, if you’re the beneficiary of state subsidies wasted on projects such as putting solar panels on the roofs of building such as the Town of Caroline Town Hall it makes all the sense in the world as you get to use other people’s money (OPM) to save money on your own bills. It’s also makes one heck of a lot of sense if you’re a corporatist invested in wrangling money of taxpayers and ratepayers to make yourself richer. It puts the free market and real capitalism to shame.

Glynn-on-Roof

Solar panels being installed on Town of Caroline Town hall – a totally unjustifiable investment of ratepayer funds for everyone but the Town.

Working backwards, let’s take another look at the NY Green Bank we wrote about back in May of last year. We noted it was, essentially, another sub-prime lending scheme pushed on New York’s State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and Public Service Commission by New York’s crime boss governor.

Now, it’s almost a year later and the NY Green Bank has announced some projects and reported on its progress, which as been snail-paced at best. It had, by the end of December, 2014, accumulated capital of $217 million and allocated only $500,000 of it to projects – one small project, actually. It had not even really “deployed” those funds, as no financing/investment agreements had been signed and closed at that point. It is now in the process of working with the Public Service Commission to get another $800 million of funding to bring its total capitalization up to a cool $1 billion. Unsurprisingly, the NRDC gang is pushing it, along with other special interest environmental groups.

PublicServiceCommission.small green bank

Other folks are skeptical and already sounding the warning bells. Here’s what the Utility Intervention Unit, in the Division of Consumer Protection, at the New York State Department of State had to say:

The NYGB’s recapitalization plan relies heavily on the assumption that there will be sufficient interest in a secondary market that would allow the NYGB to monetize its longer-term products to obtain working capital after the NYGB has utilized the $1 billion of public funds. The UIU therefore recommends that the NYGB formulate a contingency plan that would provide recapitalization funds to ensure the Green Bank’s future sustainability in the event that there is insufficient interest in the secondary market for NYGB’s products. Without a contingency plan, the NYGB may not have sufficient working capital to continue lending operations in its sixth year after capitalization of the NYGB has been completed.

Most of the recapitalization estimates and leverage projections described in the Petition rely on hypothetical transactions developed as part of a 2013 market study. That 2013 market study similarly used hypothetical examples of how recapitalization would occur.

It doesn’t take a financial wizard to read between the lines on that one – this entire NY Green Bank thing rests on a foundation of optimistic guesswork. The Independent Power Producers of New York, which is a group of companies already doing renewable projects, seems to be likewise concerned the NY Green Bank will be diverting funds away from its projects into the governor’s pet projects with no particular financial return requirements. The AARP and the Public Utility Law Project of New York also note the following:

NYSERDA’s filings to date apparently seek the Commission’s approval of funding levels for broad program parameters without any detailed information on how those programs will be implemented, how their success will be measured, or how these programs will be coordinated for the “transition” phase of the implementation of clean energy programs under the REV initiative. Nor have NYSERDA’s filings to date actually documented the basis for its alleged “savings” and efficiency results from its proposed programs and portfolios.

Their concern, evident throughout their comments, revolves around “critical affordability issues faced by many low income and moderate income customers in New York City, all of whom are at risk for higher bills and rates as a result of some of the proposals pending before the Commission.” What they’re saying, in effect, is not to keep passing on the cost of politically correct green corporatist scams onto other ratepayers who are already at the limit. They even go so far as to support many of National Fuel Gas Distribution’s comments. Those comments included these:

Distribution notes that the inability of renewable portfolio standard (“RPS”) technologies to achieve their program and budgetary goals in a cost effective manner, when the significant customer subsidies exclusively available to these technologies is properly accounted for, has required New York State to make a pivotal shift in its energy policy, evidenced by the continued capitalization of the NYGB. The program shortcomings and general intermittency of these technologies have demonstrated that subsidizing renewable energy resources alone is not economically viable. In contrast, New York State is in the ideal position to continue to support the use of clean, plentiful natural gas and simultaneously achieve measurable greenhouse gas reductions. Given the State’s close proximity to Marcellus Shale production and a reliable and robust pipeline system that can transport these supplies to New York, the State is uniquely able to take full advantage of the unprecedented abundance of natural gas resources.

National Fuel is saying what most are afraid to say; that renewables investments make little sense and New York State is foolish to ignore the much more economical Marcellus Shale right next door. It’s much closer than that, of course, but the company apparently didn’t want to push the envelope. It’s also suggesting the NY Green Bank is a necessary step away from straight-out subsidies but, like other commenters, notes the complete lack of accountability in the program as put forward to date.

green bank piggy

But, of course, it’s intended that way because this is nothing more than a corporatist slush fund or piggy bank intended to reward Cuomo’s friends. Notwithstanding the long start-up period, he got it to rush announcements of the first several projects in late October just before the election, though few, if any, of them were obviously ready to proceed. You can read all about them in this announcement. It reads like a promotion for Wall Street banks.

One of the projects happens to involve natural gas use and a co-generation concept we certainly support, but also illustrates exactly what the NY Green Bank is all about and it’s not good.

“NY Green Bank is working towards funding construction and permanent debt as the senior lender to GreenCity Power, LLC (GCP), a business which designs, builds, owns, and operates small-scale cogeneration projects in New York City’s largest commercial buildings (hospitals, hotels, office buildings, etc.). GCP’s projects will deploy high efficiency natural-gas-fired reciprocating engines to generate electricity, heating and cooling. NY Green Bank will co-invest, along with Tulum Management, in GCP’s first five projects. Once a target portfolio of operating projects has been developed, institutional investors are expected to provide permanent financing.”

Tulum Management is associated with Tulum Trust, both being run by a guy named George Polk, who knows how to work with NRDC gang types. He “worked closely with George Soros to plan the allocation of $1 billion to climate-related private equity investments, and served as the Soros representative on the board of the Powerspan Corporation, a carbon capture technology company which was one of Soros’ personal investments,” according to his bio, and has been closely associated with the largely Rockefeller-directed World Economic Forum. Here’s the revealing line from Tulum Trust’s website:

“The Tulum Trust sources and manages private equity investments for family offices, high net worth individuals, foundations and institutional investors, executing deals that generate excellent returns from building the new low carbon economy.”

Tulum knows how to latch onto State money to make money for these clients. It was, for example, instrumental in crafting a deal to take over the utility operations connected with bankrupt Eastman Kodak in Rochester, grabbing $7.1 million from the taxpayers to combine with $12 million from Capricorn Investment Management LLC to capitalize the venture.

jeff_skoll_eBay green bankCapricorn is the investment arm of Jeff Skoll and the Skoll Foundation, an affiliate of Participant Productions, whose films include Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. Skoll is the founder of E-Bay, the 144th richest man in America and a big-time fractivist (he also helped produce Promised Land). This latest venture by Tulum looks to be more of the same. If it made economic sense by itself it could have been privately funded. Either it doesn’t make economic sense and is a raid on ratepayers, or it has been included to justify the NY Green Bank, neither of which is good.

These are the people for whom the NY Green Bank is designed to make money at the expense of ratepayers already burdened to the hilt by New York’s green political correctness agenda and which Cuomo is shifting into high gear with little or no accountability. It’s the secondary mortgage scandal all over again, intended to give money to outfits like Time-Warner to install solar systems financed by other taxpayers and ratepayers; systems they’d never install on their own and which make no economic sense to anyone but them.  Time-Warner, of course, was a major Cuomo donor.

To be continued…

Check out what else is new at NaturalGasNow today!

Pennsylvania Townships - NGNlogoNew

While you’re at it, follow us on FacebookTwitter and Linked-In!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

2 thoughts on “Sunlight Needed on Solar Scams and Green Banks

  1. caroline is a terrble town. the greenies that live along rt79 are ithacans in drag. they pull all the strings in regards to the rural 2/3 of the town. the town should be dissolved. join berkshire or candor. barber is an idiot!!!

  2. Deep pockets ! Great article Tom.This gang has a lot of money on the line.Money stolen from those that can least aford it.Be careful this gang plays rough! Remember everyone-Pipes ?who needs pipes ?We need well permits before we need Pipes! -ALL NY OR NONE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads