Powered by Max Banner Ads 

We Have a New President: How Will it Affect Energy and Environmental Issues?

Hydraulic FracturingRichard Goodwin
Environmental Consultant and Engineer
West Palm Beach, Florida

 

Energy and environmental issues have long been solved according to political correctness instead of by experts; with our new President that may change.

The results of 2016 Presidential Election – Republican President [without elected political experience but a successful billionaire developer and entertainment entrepreneur] and Republican Majority in Senate and House of Representatives [enabling appointment of moderate-conservative Supreme Court Justices] – reflects a victory for the private sector and a blow to political correctness. Given this dominance of political philosophy in all branches of government, forthcoming federal legislation and actions should apply fact-based, sound business and economic principles plus peer-review science to address our Energy and Environmental Issues.


environmental issues

ENERGY

Bans on Hydraulic Fracturing [fracking] on state level (e.g. New York) and local level (e.g. Denton TX, Monterrey CA) are not based on peer review science.

A review [analysis and evaluation] of regulatory and governmental scientific peer reviews shows that Hydraulic Fracturing [HF] does not pose an environmental and/or health threat – when practiced according to sound engineering principles.

Earthquakes are not caused by HF but by the application of deep-well disposal of wastewater associated with this technology. Rather than disposes of these liquid wastes their Reuse and Recovery should be practiced,

Methane Leaks and emissions occur due to inadequate well integrity. The remedy includes improved cementing practice with in-place monitoring. Minimize the effect of pipe line leaks by ensuring that well casing is placed adequately above aquifer level. When the vertical well portion is placed one mile or more below the surface the risk to water resources is minimal but more shallow wells pose a higher risk. Well design and construction should include proper well casing, cementing and monitoring.

Applying sound engineering practice based upon lessons-learned state regulatory requirements [TX, PA], standard-setting agencies [American Society of Testing and Materials, American Petroleum Institute] and certification by licensed Professional Engineer [same as requirements for deep well installations based on Gulf of Mexico Macando Oil Spill].

ENVIRONMENT

Public policies that reflect control of GreenHouse Gases e.g. Carbon Dioxide may be based upon misunderstanding of current peer review science.

Recent peer review articles [April and May 2016] reflect a shift in scientific opinions on Global Warming and Climate Change.

Articles, appearing in American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] peer review publication, Science, question Methane Emission Control app[lied to Oil and Gas [USEPA regulation] and the effect of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation [AMOC] or Atlantic Conveyor belt causing sea level rises not melting of icebergs due to global warming.

A review of such recent peer review would place the debate about Global Warming and Climate Change within the Scientific and Technical Community. Policy Makers should be expanding their advisory teams to include experts capable of interpreting published articles to ensure a rational and logical debate.

Such an approach should be applied to national political issues – forming platforms of nominated candidates. Relying on professional politicians as advisors on such technical issues will not generate meaningful debate nor establish sound governmental policies. Using empirical results, to refute the concerns of Global Warming and Climate Change, poses a stronger argument than subjective rhetoric.

Print Friendly
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

2 thoughts on “We Have a New President: How Will it Affect Energy and Environmental Issues?

  1. I think Karen Orlando that the precautionary principle gone to the extreme is why we have the Anti shale cult out there. Any rational intelligent person who believed Carbon Dioxide emissions were a concern would back Fracking. Mixed with Blind ignorance the kool aid a Josh Fox and others dispense seems to have had few takers with the Election of Trump in Shale Land USA. I am composing a Spreadsheet on voting results in every county in America with 1000 oil or gas wells . So far the result is overwhelmingly TRUMP. Rural America overwhelmingly stated at the Ballot box that Global Climate Alarmists need not apply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads