Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Naomi Klein: The Naive Nanny of Fractivism

fracking reality

Tom Shepstone
Natural Gas NOW

 

Fractivist Naomi Klein has achieved capitalist success by bashing the institution while cheerleading for those bringing Venezuelan people to their knees.

Naomi Klein is the perfect fractivist from an elitist perspective. Snobby and condescending, she’s bought fame by decrying capitalism and the oil and gas industry. The industry improves lives every day as she condemns it to improve her brand. She serves, meanwhile, as a “Fellow” at the Nation Institute in New York City, where the building is heated with natural gas. She also resides in Ontario, Canada where natural gas is the primary heating fuel for 70% of homes. She’s just a more attractive version of Michael Moore in that respect, but every bit as hypocritical. Naomi Klein, in fact, says “the fracking industry is vicious, brutal and will stop at nothing to get its way.”

She should know, given the sorts of people and government she’s supported in the past.

Naomi Klein

Naomi Klein is a professional anti-capitalist and, more recently, a fractivist. This is what she wrote shortly after Andrew Cuomo betrayed Upstate New York to ban fracking:

Last month came the huge news that New York State would ban fracking, following a steady stream of bans and moratoria passed in local communities, as well as years of sustained pressure from the activists and scientists – like biologist and author Sandra Steingraber, co-founder of New Yorkers Against Fracking – who have tirelessly documented and spread the word about the health and climate impacts.

She also traveled to the UK (one wonders how she got there) to entertain this groveling interviewer:

This is the type of conversation that goes on in elitist fractivist circles. A pompous arrogant interviewer asks questions of an equally self-important guest on matters on which they both completely agree. Both utopians have all the answers and simply can’t comprehend how the world doesn’t bow to their every wish. They’re just so smart. Why won’t the commoners just accept their help and let them be the nannies they so desire to be?

But, just how smart might they be? Well, we only have to look at Naomi Klein’s history on that. She co-signed a letter in 2004 to Hugo Chavez, supporting the Venezuelan dictator, offering the following (emphasis added):

We are writing to express our solidarity during this important moment in Venezuela’s history. It is our hope and expectation that, on August 15, you will once again win an electoral mandate from the Venezuelan people to be their president.

The world knows that you are achieving something remarkable in Venezuela: you are investing your country’s vast oil wealth in ways that benefit everyone, not just small minority of well-connected elites. Over the last year your government’s literacy campaign taught one million Venezuelans to read. And today, millions of others are benefiting from the governments investment in job training, small businesses and health care…

We are committed to doing what we can, as U.S. citizens, to heal those relationships and encourage Congress and the White House to see Venezuela not only as a model democracy but also as a model of how a country’s oil wealth can be used to benefit all of its people.

Some 12 years later we know how it all worked out. Hugo Chavez, before he died nine years after getting this support had made himself fabulously rich. He was so rich, in fact, his daughter is now the richest woman in Venezuela, worth some $4.2 billion. Meanwhile, the country is literally starving, the military has been put in charge of the food supply and forced labor has become a reality. It is the inevitable end game whenever the socialism advanced by Naomi Klein and friends is involved.

Naomi Klein won’t be apologizing for her naiveté, of course. Humility and self-reflection are no part of her. She’s instead moved on, focusing more and more on fracking, hoping to find a fresh supply of “mush for brains” sycophants. Such is the world of fractivism, where old radicals go to find a new cause.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

5 thoughts on “Naomi Klein: The Naive Nanny of Fractivism

  1. Gold (Royal) totalitarianism …
    Suffering, destruction, death, misery, revolution, relief,

    Red totalitarianism …
    Suffering, destruction, death, misery, revolution, relief,

    Brown totalitarianism…
    Suffering, destruction, death, misery, revolution, relief,

    Black totalitarianism…
    Suffering, destruction, death, misery, revolution, relief,

    Yellow totalitarianism…
    Suffering, destruction, death, misery, revolution, relief,

    Green totalitarianism,
    Oh, Ok! This must be the right one.

    The suicidal naiveté of the masses through the ages.

  2. Two points:

    a) when did erudite become an insult? Must even we fatcats succumb to anti-intellectualism?

    b) socialists believe there is no ethical consumption under capitalism and therefore Naomi undoubtedly does not believe as you do in the hypocrisy of using fossil fuels while protesting their use

  3. Naive is a little too generous but accurate.

    However naiveté can also be almost criminally catastrophic.

    A naive person whose worldwide socialist policies diminish world growth by 1% per year will cause a slowdown that compounds to 250% of lost growth in a century. That is an enormous forfeiture of wealth, science, technology, health, and longevity.

    Then when one realizes that growth is also a proxy for technological progress and realizes that a 1% growth trendline slowdown may easily mean that the cure for cancer which may have been discovered in 2060 now has to wait until 2080 (under Naomi Klein’s less motivated and thus less productive socialism) then these proposals become outright evil. How many extra people will die from cancer between 2060 and 2080? And that is just one single effect in a very specific area. Unless one is naive enough to believe that socialism will discover cancer therapies faster than capitalism. How’s that worked in the past?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads