Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Fear Mongering Is by Far the Favorite Fractivist Tactic

Screen Shot 2014-09-02 at 3.45.08 PM

K.J. Rodgers
Crownsville, Maryland  

….
…. 

Fear is a dynamic and powerful tool, but left unchecked with false facts, it drives public opinion and results in dangerous consequences. 

Fear seems to drive people for many reasons. We have a natural inclination to fear as a species. Some fear can be a good thing. It helps us mitigate risks when making decisions, to know when to jump into action and serves as the basis of fight or flight. Unchecked, though, fear is quite the opposite. Fear based on limited knowledge or incorrect facts can be dangerous and leave someone wearing tinfoil hats, scared of everything discussed on the X-Files.

Fear is very powerful and it can be exploited. History has taught us how a few have exploited fear to cause some of the world’s most egregious acts. It comes to no surprise fractivists use fear in every single one of their calls to oppose fracking and natural gas. Fear is the basis of everything they do and communicate. It is exercised in pure exploitation of the public to pass along an ideology.

We have seen this come in many waves over the past few years. Like dropping a pebble in a small pond, these ripples of miscommunication tends to come in waves, but just like that, they are gone; leaving the instigators to cast a new stone from the same pile.

Water contamination is and will likely always be the first stone they cast. It is an easy narrative for them: if you support fracking, then you are ok poisoning your children’s water. Despite numerous studies and the EPA’s own study, in line with reports by the U.S. Geological Survey, the Government Accountability Office, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the Groundwater Protection Council; this bugaboo is still used as reason to ban hydraulic fracturing – with Dimock as the favorite whipping boy. It looks like the folks on Carter Road have much bigger problems than water, though, given the meth lab found there.

We see this fear mongering going from one extreme to the other. Now that water contamination fears don’t get the mileage they once did, activists use other techniques to strike fear; fracking will destroy your health, for example. I have discussed how anti-fracking Brian Schwartz, Professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, used junk science and data to try to link asthma and fracking. This was despite his own admission – ignored by most – that there were no real links to prove the case. Seth Whitehead, over at Energy In Depth, also reminded us asthma attacks are on a downward trend as:

“…heavily-drilled counties within the study area have far lower age-adjusted rates of asthma hospitalizations than nine counties in the study area that have no shale gas production at all.”

Brian Schwartz, too, called fracking a virus and led another debunked study claiming fracking causes premature births. At this point, he’s slinging rocks by the handful to create so many ripples, you cannot follow them.

This hysteria-inducing public health claims are again being regurgitated by anti-fracking groups. Cancer is one of the latest; it comes up over and over again. Fractivists seem to have their mind’s eye focused on a hope for a cancer cluster in some drilling area big enough to call in Erin Brockovich for another cinematic fairytale. But, just like the 2017 Oscars, they’ve been handed the wrong envelope. Seth, once again compares the facts to the claims, which we can see couldn’t be further from the truth.

fear mongering

Looking at the data from the American Cancer Society, we can see that the top-four oil and gas producing states — Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Wyoming are below the national average. When you compare these states to those with fracking bans you get the above results. For the record, fracking and drilling aren’t keeping people from getting cancer, but the facts are the exact opposite of what the fear mongering from Josh Fox and gang would have you believe.

Fear is derived from the unknown and when that unknown is filled with scary stories of hearsay and, well, let’s face it, lies; then you have a cause desperately needing some tinfoil hat therapy. Over time, with patience, the truth comes out, but what roller-coaster ride it is until the fractivists are off the ride.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

3 thoughts on “Fear Mongering Is by Far the Favorite Fractivist Tactic

  1. If fear mongering by the ant-gassers is so reprehensible, how is cherry picking items to refute them acceptable? The EnergyInDepth graphic is flawed in so many ways, one wonders why it is used.

    New York may have banned fracking, but it has 9,000+ working vertical gas wells in the Finger Lakes and western parts of the state. Vermont has banned fracking, but has no gas to begin with (how principled of them!). This is just a collection of coincidences that falls apart at first glance. Cancer isn’t generic, but unlike the discredited asthma “study” none of the characteristics or risk factors were subjected to any critical analysis. Our examples must be held to a higher standard than any of the cobbled together crap the anti’s try to pass off as science.

    Getting just one or two out of three on the Edward R. Murrow quote below is not good enough.

    To be persuasive we must be believable;
    to be believable we must be credible;
    to be credible we must be truthful.

    Also, we need to be realistic in with respect to the audience if we hope to convince them. Take, for example, the New York State audience. The Sienna College poll shows that Cuomo is more popular than ever in NY and Trump is more unpopular than before. I draw your attention to items #3, #6, #11, #12. Notice in #11 that 29% of Republicans and 31% of conservatives would vote for Cuomo. I think this reinforces the opinion I’ve put in my comments and article that NGN site conservatives need to broaden their message to moderates and draw people to gas without attempting to change their political or environmental views.

    http://naturalgasnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/SNY0217_Crosstabs.pdf

  2. I had an idea for a bit of pro-gas fearmongering.. A short television ad, something like this..

    A suburban neighborhood, nice homes on landscaped lots. Winter time; snow reflecting a full moon.. Homes are dark. Zoom in on one to see a candle burning in a bedroom.. A child shivers in her bed – Mommy, I’m so cold”.. The mother tries to comfort her, telling her “It will be OK in the morning when the sun comes out”.. Cut to a solar farm, dark and inactive.. And then to a wind farm, turbines completely still.. Closing credits: “Brought to you by the rabid environmentalists and their wealthy foundation backers, who want to preserve the earht for themselves”

  3. The next time you want to smear Susquehanna Countians with mention of a meth lab, you might want to first try bothering to investigate which “side” the meth lab suspects were on. It turns out they were some of your Cabot-defending buddies!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads