Powered by Max Banner Ads 

While Enviros Whine, Natural Gas Is Actually Reducing CO2

LNG - Nick Grealy ReportsNick Grealy
Administrator of NoHotAir/ReImagineGas Blog

….
….

Friends of the Earth and other enviro groups whine about coal and climate and such, but it is the natural gas industry that’s actually reducing CO2.

A UK ruling exposing the fraudulent nature of its anti-fracking campaign “ticked off” Friends of the Earth and has led to the opening, by them, of a new front in a new anti-fracking line of attack.

Donna Hume, a Friends of the Earth senior campaigner, said: “No ruling has been made against us. The ASA offered to drop the case without ruling after we confirmed that a particular leaflet was no longer being used.

“We continue to campaign against fracking because burning fossil fuels is dangerous for the climate. As well as that, the process of exploring for and extracting shale gas is inherently risky for the environment, this is why fracking is banned or put on hold in so many countries.”

Reality Check: Fracking is banned or put on hold in so many countries by using those same Friends of the Earth tactics exposed today.

reducing co2

The Friends of the Earth leaflet that UK authorities said was deceptive and misleading. It included a photo of a Cumbrian lake where no fracking is planned, made numerous hysterical claims and followed the template used by fractivists everywhere.

Donna Hume, ignoring the chastisement just received, then dug deeper in the FT:

Donna Hume, senior campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said the case was intended by Cuadrilla “to distract from the real issues about fracking, and how burning fossil fuels is dangerous for climate change.”

That’s interesting, because they have steadfastly refused to debate on this very issue. The UK onshore industry should welcome the debate moving to climate, because this is one we can also win.

On the debate itself, firstly some fossil fuels are bad for the climate. And, some should be kept in the ground. But which and whose fossil fuels?  Answer this question, and shale gas protests will remain where they mostly are: A minority obsession of the misguided.

The industry and environmentalists already agree on coal. We hate it as much as Friends of the Earth (FoE) , but they don’t do much about it and the natural gas  industry needs to point out how we beat it more and more every day.  A climate debate with the FoE should be welcomed.  Almost everything they say is an open goal.  Keep it in the ground? Of course. Keep coal in the ground, which is a quick, easy and elegant way of combatting the CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) debate too.  Keep coal in the ground everywhere.  There’s enough gas globally to do this if anyone’s serious.

Reducing CO2But, then, as the Friends of the Earth say, “Shop Local First.”  That’s a campaign with as catchy a title as “Keep It In The Ground,” but with two important differences:

Firstly, unlike “Keep It In The Ground,” it not only makes a lot of easy sense, it works.

Secondly, it makes consumers themselves aware of their choices.

The problem with energy is that people feel divorced from it.  Apart from FoE, few people use the F word with electricity and gas until the bill turns up. Most people think electricity comes out of the wall and don’t realize the huge chain from the well head to the burner tip of their central heating either.  The gas and electricity industries spend a huge amount of time and fortune thinking of gas and electricity so that consumers don’t give it even a second thought.

Our success is thus our undoing.  As a result many people think electricity falls out of the sky, making them especially  open to persuasion that it could fall out of the sky and that only the oil and gas industry, not the laws of physics or the reality of geography are preventing them from having a perfect zero carbon future.

At the same time, people have been so inured to lights, heat, mobility and connectivity that they only think of power when it doesn’t show up. They hate it and love it all at once.

The debate can now move to the three big Issues of the energy trilemma: carbon, security of supply and affordability.  Shale has to fight the war on these three fronts.

Talking about security of supply is a complex. The old debate of “When will the lights go out” is so 2005 Peak Oil.  We’re up to our butts in gas, but the question of where gas comes from is important.  We should be able to combine fears of imports with green fears of high carbon, for example, to produce a cleaner, greener and inherently better Drill Local First campaign that makes sense, reducing CO2 in the process.

Then it comes down to price. I could write a book on gas prices, but because I can write a book on gas prices, who needs yet another “expert”?  The public, at least according to the media who profess to speak for them, don’t do complicated.  And, nothing is more complicated, more covered in alternate layers of transparency and deceit than energy prices.

So, on gas prices we should just try and give the Reader’s Digest version to people, which is in fact a bit easier now the shale revolution has arrived, or just point out some obvious home truths.  We can fold that into security of supply.

But, carbon is complicated and incredibly easy at the same time. The issue isn’t just a UK one. It’s called global warming for a reason. Just as “Shop Local First” makes the guilty rich feel slightly less guilty and make them slightly less rich by paying a premium for local, so, too, can the benefits of local over imported energy be made more obvious.

We need to make the idea of using imported high carbon zero tax natural gas from Russia, for example, as socially unacceptable as buying non free range eggs or not recycling. “Think Global, Act Local” was one of the great lines of the 1970’s.  It urges people to consider the health of the entire planet and to take action in their own communities.  We can flip that brand and make people realize that in the big picture, local natural gas is as much a no brainer as locally produced eggs.

reducing co2

Cuadrilla rig exploring UK shale

2017 is going to be a pivotal year in UK shale.  We’ve come so far to fail now, especially when the opposition present such an open goal for the industry like climate.

We all know in the UK that our little corner of the world in the rest of Europe is watching.  France, Germany, Ireland, Holland and Spain beckon. UK shale will be simply the opening act of a wonderful opportunity.  Of course it’s taken an age to get various people to come to their senses, but once they do…

European shale has high costs of entry measured in time. But, on the other side we have rapid commercialization into existing infrastructure into a high priced market.  I know it’s tough to take the long view for what sometimes seems like ever and ever and ever. But all bad things must come to an end. The other side will be something wonderful for everyone in the UK, Europe and indeed throughout the very same earth with which the FoE pretend to have such an amicable relationship.

Editor’s Note: Once again, we’re delighted here at NaturalGasNow to support development of UK shale. It makes perfect sense and will strengthen the Western world as a whole. Yet, we can’t help pointing out we’re also ready to ship the UK and Europe LNG, which serves to help make Nick’s point, of course. The bigger point, though, is that shale development on both sides of the big pond makes all of us more energy secure and helps in reducing CO2 as FoE but dreams and whines about doing the same. The natural gas industry is the one getting it done, whether we’re talking UK shale or Marcellus Shale LNG.

Print Friendly
Email this to someoneShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Digg thisFlattr the authorShare on RedditShare on YummlyShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on TumblrBuffer this pagePin on Pinterest

3 thoughts on “While Enviros Whine, Natural Gas Is Actually Reducing CO2

  1. I live in coal country in southwest PA and I disagree with the leave it in the ground concept for coal. Just like natural gas and oil coal is used for more than generating electricity. Coal is used to produce coke which is then used to make steel. It produces a lot of jobs also. Coal can be burned a lot cleaner than it used to be and there are technologies for capturing and storing the CO2.

    It goes deeper than that. Coal is also used to make products and some of them are lifesaving like charcoal. Charcoal is used not only for cooking but is also used to make filters that are used to filter water and other liquids. The list goes on. Coal can also be converted to methane then used for generating electricity. Coal releases methane when mined which could be captured and used also. I don’t hate coal as stated in this article. I also don’t hate renewable energy such as solar and wind. I believe in the all of the above strategy and using the energy sources that work in each area. One thing that I don’t believe is that CO2 is a pollutant and is causing global warming.

    “Thousands of products are made with coal or coal by-products, including aspirins, soap, dyes, solvents, plastics, and fibers such as rayon or nylon. Coal is an important ingredient in production of products that require activated carbon, carbon fiber or silicon metal. Activated carbon is an essential ingredient in the production of air purification and water filters as well as kidney dialysis machines.”

    Read more here:
    https://www.reference.com/science/list-things-made-coal-2453d0f7210c4342#

  2. Pingback: Natural Gas Is Clean, It's Now and It Doesn't Need Our SubsidiesNatural Gas Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads