Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Did Cuomo’s Fracking Ban Create A New York Willing to Ban Any Energy Project?

delaware riverkeeper - Jim Willis reportsJim Willis
Editor & Publisher, Marcellus Drilling News (MDN)

 

Solar and wind energy projects in New York are facing the same struggles natural gas faced years ago; being over regulated and nobody wants them in their town.

In June 2014, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, reaffirmed two lower court rulings that empowers townships and municipalities across the state to strip away property owners’ rights to allow drilling and other energy projects. NY’s high court ruled in the “Middlefield” and “Dryden” cases that local municipalities have the right to regulate energy development within their jurisdictions–where it can and cannot happen.

The seeds planted with the “Dryden” and “Middlefield” cases has sprouted and is now in full bloom–like spring daffodils. So-called “renewable” energy projects are now being blocked using the very same decisions meant to block natural gas drilling–delicious irony that puts a big, fat smile on our face.

On the other hand, it points out the truly horrific consequences by NY’s highest court in allowing each community to, in effect, regulate energy production. It is utter folly and lunacy. Welcome to New York.

Two weeks ago MDN told you about a NY town that intends to ban solar farms. It’s not the first case of a solar ban.

energy project

We now have an example of a town that just passed a ban on windmills, in New York’s North Country:

The wind company planning to build a 27-turbine wind farm says the approval by the town board of its wind law has effectively banned the project from the town with zoning ordinances.

The wind law was proposed by the Hopkinton Wind Advisory Board. The law was primarily written by the Wind Advisory Board.

“The vote taken last night effectively zones out wind in Hopkinton,” said Avangrid spokesperson Paul Copleman. “The most disheartening thing about this abrupt reversal and improper revote is that it surrenders to the handful of opponents using intimidating tactics and ignores so many voices in the community.”

Avangrid lawyers emailed town councilmembers last week questioning the legality of the vote. The lawyer claimed that the town needed to hold a public forum prior to another vote.

“It’s a rejection of even considering new economic development and jobs that would benefit so many in Hopkinton, a rejection of significant new school funding, and it shuts down a collaborative, community-wide process that still has a long way to go,” Copleman said.

The spokesman says Avangrid has made clear what science-backed changes are necessary to the Wind Advisory Board recommendations to allow a wind farm in Hopkinton.

“If the town in the very near term can examine those changes to the zoning ordinance, we may consider re-engaging with Hopkinton, but last night’s pre-emptive rejection means we will focus on other New York projects in areas with clearer paths to pursue renewable development.”

The law calls for a setback requirement of five times the total height of a turbine from non-participating property lines, public roads, wind overlay boundary, non-WECS building, farm or commercial structures or any above-ground utilities, registered historical sites and the APA boundary.

The local law requires adherence to a maximum 40 dBA at the nearest non-participating property line, school, hospital, place of worship or building existing at the time of the application.

The law also prohibits turbines on land south of SH 72.

Avangrid says its project would bring roughly $30 million to the area.

Sorry Avangrid (aka Spanish-owned Iberdrola). Where were you when our property rights were at stake the first time around, with the Dryden and Middlefield cases? Far too little and too late. Kiss your windmill farm in Hopkinton goodbye. Ain’t gonna happen.

Who, in their right mind, would build ANY energy project in New York State? With Dryden and Middlefield, all it takes is the next town board election to completely change a town’s outlook on whether or not to allow a new energy project–whether it be natural gas drilling, compressor stations for pipelines, solar farms or windmills. The cancer of Dryden and Middlefield is spreading across the state, causing “home rule” chaos.

Speaking of Dryden, as we were doing research for this post, we found an article from March 2017 that puts an even bigger smile on our face. Dryden itself is resisting/blocking a solar project! As near as we can tell, the solar project went nowhere and will not get built. The main objection from the residents of Dryden? Folks don’t want to look at solar panels as they visit their “loved ones” at the local graveyard.

energy projects

Amy Dickinson is opposed to the proposed solar projects near Willow Glen Cemetery

We kid you not:

The approximately 100 people who packed the Dryden Town Hall Thursday, March 16 were saying the same things in varying examples and terms.

We want solar. But not in these spots.

The town board heard at the public hearing from more than 25 people, the mass of which forced vehicles to line the side of the road due to a lack of parking, who voiced their opposition to the two large solar array projects

Distributed Sun has proposed on Stevenson Road (the “Ellis tract”) and 2150 Dryden Rd.

The Washington, D.C. based company has proposed Community Distributed Generation projects–arrays that transfer electricity generated in the form of bill credits for residents.

Most will occur on Cornell University land taking up six different sites around Stevenson, Dodge and Turkey Hill Roads that will require a Special Use Permit.

“I’m not here as NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard),” Ellis-area resident Ethan Ash said, “but I’m here as WIMBY, which I just came up with, which is ‘Why In My Back Yard?’ And it’s a question my son asked on the way over here because we do walk that road every single day with our two other kids and our dog.”

Ash, who said he was excited about solar and brought his young son for the learning experience, said his neighborhood is not only the group’s community gathering place, but it’s also others’ as well with people coming to go for walks or jogs or bringing binoculars to see the animals.

He called it a “park for many people,” and said the drive out to Dryden is storage facility after storage facility on “land clearly no one cares about,” but in reference to the Ellis Hollow tract, people care about that land.

The proposal for the Ellis tract is eight two-megawatt and two one-megawatt solar photovoltaic arrays, totaling 18 megawatts that would connect to the NYSEG grid.

According to the plan documents on the Dryden Town website. The arrays will be on either side of Stevenson Road and will be in three different areas.

Everyone who spoke to either project cited environmental concerns, the broadness of the project, what they found to be confusing documentation and for the Dryden Road project, the fact the arrays would be directly next to the historic cemetery.

“It’s like the wild kingdom and for that to be destroyed would be terrible … a travesty … a scar on the landscape,” Robert Kuehn said to loud cheers.

Sharon Ordway told the board in her remarks that it’s the huge scale of the project that worries her and that the property is “not empty fields” but rather homes to the animals. She brought sheets of animal species and flora to sit in front of the town board members’ chamber.

The solar arrays sit at most eight feet from the ground, senior vice president Bharath Srinivasan said, and Distributed Sun has used sheep on all of its properties as a natural lawn mower. It means no chemicals or labor for keeping the grass low.

Similar issues were put out about the Dryden Road project, which would be out back of the Willow Glen Cemetery.

Sarah and Joe Osmeloski, who spoke at public comment late last year on the cell tower proposed there, said their concern was the scope of the project and that it “circumvents our law by requesting a subdivision,” Sara said, and splitting it into six separate parcels.

“Where will these creatures live if Distributed Sun is able to pave 75 acres of their home in glass?” Sarah asked.

Joe read the “Protecting Dryden” political party’s statement, the line on which each of the five board members ran and won, and reminded the board it was why the people voted for them.

The party is based partially on protecting the town’s natural resources, specifically from “infiltration by the gas industry.”

“A lot of the people probably voted for you and hope that you stick with what you basically took an oath to protect Dryden,” Joe said.

The biggest issue people came out forwas the cemetery, with cemetery board members and the head of board of directors speaking during the public comment.

Brad Perkins said he owed it to the 7,500 people buried there and the 2,400 more who have plots to speak at the meeting. He told the board it will affect cemetery revenue as people don’t want to see solar arrays when they visit their beloved family members and referenced the 300 jobs Distributed Sun said it would create.

“After this (construction) is done it takes no labor at all,” he said, telling the board and audience “don’t be fooled.”

Nancy and Edward Couch, wife and husband, spoke and said they had ancestors there.

“I think we should protect our veterans by keeping these things out of sight of our cemetery,” said Edward, a veteran.

Nearly every person who spoke emphasized their enthusiasm for solar and some presented their arguments as questions to the board or recommendations.

After addressing that people seemed to be for it, Bob Schindelbeck suggested the board put a higher criteria on the site and importance of finding a good place first.

“And working backward from a site that works for the people,” he said.

David Bruno-Cullen asked why solar companies weren’t building over parking lots, like those at Cornel and TC3, and Holly Payne spoke for the projects, saying if the people have a proposal to do it properly they should be on board.

“Please remember we are trying to get rid of fossil fuels for our children,” she said.

Buzz Dolph also spoke for the project, asking if anyone would be OK with a solar array in their backyard but adding that he would be proud to look from his window and see one with the knowledge it will help change the course the world is going down at the moment.

Dryden’s two legislators got in the last words on the topic. Martha Robertson (D-Dryden) disputed some of the information public commenters had used and stressed action on behalf of the environment.

“It is up to us,” she said. “We have already messed it up almost beyond repair.” “Please, we have to embrace this,” she added.

Mike Lane (D-Dryden) said he was speaking for himself and not as a legislator and voiced displeasure to “hear anything that would make this a political issue.”

“People here appreciate solar. They understand it,” Lane said. “Does that mean we have to go full speed into giant solar arrays? No.”

Lane recommended the board take into consideration looking at “more small ones [solar arrays] and less bigger ones.”

As Ash had before him, Lane referenced the drive from Ithaca to Dryden on Route 13 and the view of the valley around the curve.

“Watch over that valley and you see our high school, and you see our community college, things we’re so proud of as a community,” he said. “And you see that green space that is there because of the water that we have, the water that we protected when we came out against fracking early on. The water that makes it grow green. We can’t, we need to look.

Yes indeed. Sauce for the gander.

For more great articles on natural gas development every single business day, subscribe to Marcellus Drilling News using this convenient link.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

9 thoughts on “Did Cuomo’s Fracking Ban Create A New York Willing to Ban Any Energy Project?

  1. How come these residents are not proposing that solar arrays be placed in brownfields? Of course, you still need “fossil fuels” to manufacture, construct and maintain solar arrays… but when facts don’t matter, What the hay?

  2. Of course, when it becomes financially feasible, the oneidas and senecas will be “checkerboarding” like no tomorrow when it comes gas exploration. NYSDEC rules do not apply to them.

  3. To those who say they are saving the environment via wind farms? Think again….at least concede that there are downsides to it. See below

  4. Within a few miles of the Willow Glen Site there is a reclaimed landfill which would be perfect for the solar array. But the board refuses to consider it, even though it is the perfect alternative. It cannot be seen from any major road and is by its very nature isolated. Two standards: the rule of law only applies to people and projects that aren’t allied to the radical Left ideological orthodoxy. God forbid that you disagree with them, for you risk being burned at the social media stake for blasphemy. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if these ideologues played by the same rules that they demand of everyone else.

    • I was with you until you rattled off that unhelpful “radical Left ideological orthodoxy” phrase. There are other terms that might explain it. Start with NIMBY and WIMBY and add NIMLOS (Not In My Line Of Sight), which has been around since the 1970’s, and one I just modestly invented, NIMTi (Not In My Time).

      I add that one because my township did a survey a few years ago about zoning, gas, renewables and infrastructure. My township is Republican by a large majority, but a significant fraction of the people against gas were also against any energy development, gas or renewable. They want no change in anything at all. An older woman, knowing I was a gas supporter, complained “Can’t you leave things alone until after I dead?”.

      They are more than willing to “zone out” anything that threatens the “rural character” of their village or town. The Middlefield decision may have been the result of attempted gas development, but remember these people are against all development. They are actually reactionaries and Middlefield zoning restriction is the tool close at hand.

  5. From the article: “People here appreciate solar. They understand it,” Lane said. “Does that mean we have to go full speed into giant solar arrays? No.” Sure they understand it. What they have been fed for years by the Park Foundation and their useful idiots is that solar generated power would someday be “free”. I hope the folks in Dryden get HUGE solar installations, preferably right in their back yards as a little payback for what they did to landowner’s mineral rights and the fracking ban.

    • The irony is that huge solar arrays can wipe out valuable forest and other productive agricultural lands. If CO2 is the enemy, why displace the very plants that convert it into Oxygen and highly prized sugars? Every so often around places like Planet Ithaca you see a multitude of “No Farms, No Food” bumper stickers affixed to a gas guzzling AWD SUV. The hypocrisy is unfathomable!!! This is why people like that cannot be taken seriously.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


 Powered by Max Banner Ads